3 ms·
We considered Flow initially as well - but aside from its built-in maybe types (we use Monapt for this!), it's a subset of TypeScript feature-wise that doesn't
by jiaweihli 11y ago
We considered Flow initially as well - but aside from its built-in maybe types (we use Monapt for this!), it's a subset of TypeScript feature-wise that doesn't iterate as quickly.
- WorldMaker 11y agoSide question: when evaluating/updating Monapt did you take a look at any of the "Fantasy Land" compliant implementations? (https://github.com/fantasyland/fantasy-land https://github.com/fantasyland/fantasy-land)
- jiaweihli 11y agoAh! I think I saw this awhile back. I didn't refer to it too much when working on Monapt since it seems to serve a more abstract purpose, and since Monapt's original purpose was to emulate Scala syntax.
- Keats 11y agoWhich feature are you using in TypeScript that wasn't in Flow?
- jiaweihli 11y agolet, const, decorators, string interpolation, other ES6/7 goodies. Also a few other compelling things like abstract classes and community type definitions.