3 ms·
They explicitly state 'more useful'. That is the metric they are using, better ads are ads which are more useful. For example. Until a day or two I did not kno
by hahainternet 11y ago
They explicitly state 'more useful'. That is the metric they are using, better ads are ads which are more useful.
For example. Until a day or two I did not know the 'MX Master' mouse existed. An advert for this would have been useful.
- rchmura 11y agoUseful and obtrusive are not mutually exclusive. Is it useful to have only large companies with large ad budgets peddle a slight iteration to their product line as "the next best thing", while smaller companies with a really great (superior) product don't get the exposure. The smaller company would have lower margins because they invest much more in superior materials, QA, R&D, etc. Where the larger company has an advantage because they invest more of their margin on ads. Note: I have an "MX Performance" and I would not recommend that line of mice no matter what the ads originally said.