2 ms·
As far as his reference to Google, it seems the next sentence is what he means: “I understood the rule of cash, so we did everything we could to manage for reve
by firasd 11y ago
As far as his reference to Google, it seems the next sentence is what he means: “I understood the rule of cash, so we did everything we could to manage for revenue, and the rest is history.”
- weinzierl 11y agoThat's how I understand it. I just think what he said in the sentences before is potentially slanderous. Doesn't he basically accuse Novel's management at the time of fraud?
- kelukelugames 11y agoIt's not slander if it's true. "the books" is a permanent record and can be easily verified if it goes to litigation.
- rancur 11y ago> not slander if it's true but that's trade secret! no seriously, I wonder if that's been tried.
- kelukelugames 11y agoIt's literally the law. At least that's what my lawyer told me. I hope she's not lying?
- dekhn 11y ago"Revenue solves all problems". http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/10/schmidt-revenue-solves-all-problems-in-business-and-government/246209/ http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/10/schmidt-...