5 ms·
This was both insightful and highlights, i would argue, an unmet need. I would love simple write ups like this for specific software licenses. In theory, tldrl
by liquidise 11y ago
This was both insightful and highlights, i would argue, an unmet need. I would love simple write ups like this for specific software licenses.
In theory, tldrlegal.com is positioned to take this on, but in my experience they tend to deal with more pervasive licenses like MIT, GNU, etc.
- dogweather 11y agoThanks! Maybe I've found my niche. I checked out tldrlegal.com first, but saw what you're talking about. It's more of a comparison tool for the bigger licenses.
- mayneack 11y agohttps://tosdr.org/ https://tosdr.org/
- dogweather 11y agoYes! That's a great site. Thanks for reminding me.
- burnte 11y agoI always include a "plain english" copy of my contracts when I send them to customers. I state that it's there for reference only, not a substitute for a lawyer on their part, but that I've made the best effort to make it representative of the contract. Most of my client love it, some don't care, but I think it's something that has helped a lot of folks. I think most contracts should have one.
- querious 11y agoShould there be an intermediary the client needs to sign that the summary isn't a perfect representation of the contract? Kidding, of course. Mostly.
- peterkelly 11y agoThere is, but that's a detail omitted from the summary
- burnte 11y agoNo, because the signatory parties are still responsible for knowing what their signing anyway. If the summary was significantly different than the contents, then one MIGHT have an argument a judge could agree with, but in general, if you sign it, then you better have read it because you agreed to it, summary or no.
- reagency 11y agoNo competent client, or their lawyer, should trust that summary.
- burnte 11y agoNo summary or contract is trustworthy, so no, they shouldn't trust it. Trust is between parties, not between papers. It's more of a shortcut and guide. If there's something in the summary that's a red flag, well we just saved a lot of time by finding the matter fast. If not, then we should have a good idea what's in the contract, and if that contract significantly differs from the summary, then the party isn't trustworthy. It's much easier to read a contract with an idea of what it's supposed to say, than going in blind. With the summary, your mind is more focused on "is X true or false" rather than determine what it says, THEN see if the details are kosher.
- hobarrera 11y agoNo, but the summary might help avoiding bothering your lawyer if you see there's something you don't like right away in the summary. I guess that's mostly the point really.
- dogweather 11y agoTldrlegal seems dead, unfortunately.