That could be very true, but it's not the point he's trying to make. He is using spending figures as if they were on equal footing: Just look at Texas, which s

That could be very true, but it's not the point he's trying to make. He is using spending figures as if they were on equal footing: Just look at Texas, which spends 12 percent less per pupil with a similar kind of population but does significantly better educating its kids. I see no discussion of cost of living, fiscal policies, or zoning.