2 ms·
I upvoted you because you have the right sentiment imo. Special prices for black people or people with red hair would be ridiculous and those groups are even mo
by bluecalm 11y ago
I upvoted you because you have the right sentiment imo. Special prices for black people or people with red hair would be ridiculous and those groups are even more underrepresented than women are.
The thing is though that women have it harder in chess the same way as in boxing, tennis or sprinting.
People try to run circles about the fact that there are very significant biological differences which influence performance in chess but if you ever were a part of competitive chess world (or any intellectual game really, for example bridge) you wouldn't argue with that. It's just too obvious looking at children taking up chess and seeing the pace of progress they make.
There are many lazy slobs who are better at chess than the most dedicated women out there (maybe with exception of Hou Yifan). It's the same way a lazy smoking overweight aged player from somewhere in top 200 of ATP would absolutely destroy Serena Williams, it's just the difference is smaller in chess but it's still there.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- minority-one 11y agoAnd yet you and other commenters keep getting downvoted because many old-time HN'ers with the ability to downvote seem to have a hard time coming to grips with the fact that men and women have different capabilities. Notice how you only see the downvotes, not anyone trying to explain how is it that if men and women are equally capable, that only 1 in the top 100 chess players is a woman, and only 18 in the top 1000 are women.