3 ms·
https://www.shazam.com/ https://www.shazam.com/ http://www.soundhound.com/ http://www.soundhound.com/ http://www.midomi.com/ http://www.midomi.com/ http://ec
by mintplant 11y ago
https://www.shazam.com/ https://www.shazam.com/
http://www.soundhound.com/ http://www.soundhound.com/
http://www.midomi.com/ http://www.midomi.com/
http://echoprint.me/ http://echoprint.me/
http://the.echonest.com/ http://the.echonest.com/
- shmerl 11y agoThanks. I'm looking for something simple enough that doesn't require any accounts. Looks like Shazam and Soundhound have no Web services and require registration. Midomi has recording widget, but no sample upload (that's somewhat weird). Echoprint is open, I'll take a look at that. Echonest doesn't seem to have any service on their site (not sure how it's used).
- timboslice 11y agoCheck out musicbrainz
- shmerl 11y agoThanks. I thought it's more for meta information (I know VLC uses it to identify audio by meta tags). Looks like they support acoustic fingerprinting too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MusicBrainz#Fingerprinting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MusicBrainz#Fingerprinting
- scott_karana 11y agoSoundhound doesn't (or didn't?) require registration if you're using the mobile app, if that's an option.
- shmerl 11y agoSuch kind of stuff should really support something very simple. I.e. upload a file through a Web form, and get some result.
- scott_karana 11y agoI agree, but I can also see their reasoning. It's much easier to script and abuse an HTTP form than it is to abuse a (presumably more locked down) phone app with access to a closed API.