3 ms·
It wasn't Steve's building. It was Apple's, or more likely Apple was leasing someone else's building. Also, disabled parking spaces are regulated by local, sta
by jsprogrammer 11y ago
It wasn't Steve's building. It was Apple's, or more likely Apple was leasing someone else's building.
Also, disabled parking spaces are regulated by local, state, and federal agencies; not Steve Jobs' whims.
- coldtea 11y ago>It wasn't Steve's building. It was Apple's, or more likely Apple was leasing someone else's building. Not that different, since he created Apple and Apple leased that building. I'm more annoyed by public companies throwing out their original founders than by this. >Also, disabled parking spaces are regulated by local, state, and federal agencies; not Steve Jobs' whims. Even ones belonging to a company? Can't they arrange their parking however they like?
- hdctambien 11y agoYes, even parking spaces belonging to a company. Americans with Disabilities Act: https://adata.org/learn-about-ada https://adata.org/learn-about-ada
- scott_karana 11y ago> I'm more annoyed by public companies throwing out their original founders than by this. Apple's board had fairly decent reasons to through Jobs out. Look at his track record at the time. It was good for both parties.
- rhino369 11y agoIf founders want to control their company they shouldn't sell their equity. It's 100% in their control.
- staunch 11y agoNot if they sell equity!