3 ms·
> Good money losses value at a constant, manageable, predictable rate Relative to what? Other currencies? Commodities? Gold? Money doesn't exist in a vacuum.
by roymurdock 11y ago
> Good money losses value at a constant, manageable, predictable rate
Relative to what? Other currencies? Commodities? Gold? Money doesn't exist in a vacuum.
Good money is stable money is well-governed money. When supply and demand are tailored to suit time-specific economic needs, such as in periods of growth or contraction in order to avoid disasters such as hyperinflation.
> If a dollar is held at the end of a day by the same person that held it at the beginning of the day, some utility was left on the table.
In a growing economy undergoing inflation, yes. Thing is, nothing can grow forever. If you keep a dollar in your pocket during deflationary times, you are maximizing utility because you can buy more goods tomorrow with that dollar you've saved. So sometimes it makes sense to hoard and save.
It's all relative.
- drdeca 11y agoI assume relative to a market basket of goods?
- jipsom 11y agoyes but Nash's point relies on the observation that the process of picking suitable "goods" (or services, or utilities, or stable costs etc.) can be politically corruptible as well. So theoretically the ideal standard lies here, but you have to solve the problem of political power and corruption as well. Nash's points this out, and then proceeds to propose a different view that alludes to a creative solution.