3 ms·
I'll give him the CEO, but I disagree with the founder status. He was an investor, not a founder.
by talmand 11y ago
I'll give him the CEO, but I disagree with the founder status. He was an investor, not a founder.
- georgeecollins 11y agoI think it is because Pixar wasn't originally an animation studio. In particular they didn't intend to produce movies themselves. When they became one, he was a founder.
- talmand 11y agoNo, they were a part of a company that was almost a studio in of itself. The people that started that division with Lucas, that was eventually purchased by Jobs, wanted to make movies from the beginning. It was their stated goal at the time and they repeat the claim today. It was Jobs that had other ideas for the company, people, and technology before Toy Story came to be.
- samstave 11y agoMy understanding was that he purchased Pixar from Lucas for $10mm when Lucas didn't think that there was going to be a very lucrative animation business. This was told to me by employees of ILM when I was building the letterman digital arts center.
- talmand 11y agoYes, those people founded what became Pixar. Jobs bought it from Lucas. I'm going by the books I've read about Pixar written by employees or authors that interviewed employees.
- sgustard 11y agoQuoting http://www.pixar.com/about/Our-Story http://www.pixar.com/about/Our-Story >Steve Jobs purchases the Computer Graphics Division from George Lucas and establishes an independent company to be christened "Pixar."
- talmand 11y agoYep, he "purchased" it. What became know as Pixar was indeed the people at the Computer Graphics Division at LucasFilm. They are the ones I call founder.