2 ms·
Some see it differently: http://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/optimalscientist.html http://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/optimalscientist.html But it would still be anar
by rndn 11y ago
Some see it differently: http://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/optimalscientist.html http://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/optimalscientist.html
But it would still be anarchic (without the laws of human psychology and social interactions at least). However, it would be an algorithm, and thus, in its broadest sense, a method.
- joe_the_user 11y agoFrom your link: "Check out the formal theory of creativity (1990-2010) which explains science, art, music, humor, and describes the simple algorithmic principles of artificial scientists & artists." I think most scientist would agree that science involves method, indeed most science involve multiple, nested methods. But I think most scientists would be very skeptical of any claim to have fully codified a single scientific method, much less a theory of all creative endeavors. So your link seems like bending the stick way too far the other way.
- rndn 11y agoThat's right, I should've written "diametrically different".