4 ms·
Do you mean: "Why won't this eventually be available on a drugstore counter so I can diagnose myself?" The FDA's response for decades is this: you don't have a
by joezydeco 11y ago
Do you mean: "Why won't this eventually be available on a drugstore counter so I can diagnose myself?"
The FDA's response for decades is this: you don't have a lab to perform a more detailed confirmation (because false positives sometimes do happen), and you have no doctor or counselor to be there with you when you get the results.
I worked for a biotech firm that had an instant HIV test available a long long time ago. It was deemed too irresponsible to let people to check themselves at home because the company (and the FDA, and everyone's lawyers) were afraid of people doing rash things after a positive result. If a false-positive HIV patient killed themselves and the family sues, that would be...bad.
Even today, the home-HIV test that's on the market involves you sending in the sample and then getting a phone call with the results.
- ada1981 11y agoThis is no longer true. When I went I get tested for HIV in SF at the free clinic, they wouldn't do it because they said I wasn't really at risk(!) despite having multiple female partners since my last test, including a Standford doctor who was in the ER all the time.. Anyway, I went to a pharmacy and paid $50 for an at home test kit that did indeed tell me yes/no in about 15 minutes. My brother has taken the same kind of test in NYC.
- maxxxxx 11y agoIt's ironic that people need to be protected from the shock of a diagnosis but it's OK to shock them with a six figure hospital bill...