2 ms·
Certainly there are no claims of quantum physics being relevant. That would make me much more suspicious. There's been a lot of "normal" bayesian modeling in
by jedharris 11y ago
Certainly there are no claims of quantum physics being relevant. That would make me much more suspicious.
There's been a lot of "normal" bayesian modeling in cognitive psych and it has problems with the examples they address. So the point isn't data modeling per se, it is better data modeling, which is often worth a look.
- dekhn 11y agoActually, if you read all the author's papers, they are strongly hinting at the underlying mechanism being quantum. But they never come quite out and say that.