3 ms·
I would really hold off on Angular. The development path of that project seems to indicate a dead end. And as far as technologies go for a new project that's s
by Daishiman 11y ago
I would really hold off on Angular.
The development path of that project seems to indicate a dead end. And as far as technologies go for a new project that's supposed to start quickly, it has some tremendously complex abstractions while having issues with debugging.
This is all a pet peeve of mine, but I think the kind of two-way data binding that Angular proposes will be seen in the long run as a mistake. The fact that you can't just understand what's going on behind the hood without reading tons of documentation in the middle is very troublesome.
- deathtrader666 11y ago+1 I'd run away from Angular, into Ember-land!
- johan_larson 11y agoDead end? What makes you say that?
- Daishiman 11y agoThe fact that the very developers of Angular have stated that Angular 2.0 will not be backward-compatible with Angular 1.0, and the reason why Angular 2.0 is being made is because the operating assumptions of browser capabilities when Ng 1 was made have changed radically.