5 ms·
The fake blog is probably from a Markov generator. I've always liked that as a blackhat SEO strategy. However, it seems like it isn't that much more expensive
by JeffJenkins 17y ago
The fake blog is probably from a Markov generator. I've always liked that as a blackhat SEO strategy. However, it seems like it isn't that much more expensive to generate real content -- like the recent post about eHow and bingo cards -- so there isn't a point in taking that risk
- kwamenum86 17y agoI thought Markov generators synthesize text? The text from this blog appears to be stolen from other sources.
- JeffJenkins 17y agoThis is the key phrase from the article: "It looks like the “blog posts” are fragments from places like Wikipedia run through some obfuscator" A Markov generator will create text based on the text it's trained on, and because of the way it works you'll end up with little snippets from the text sources. Here's an online one you can play with: http://www.beetleinabox.com/mkv_input.html http://www.beetleinabox.com/mkv_input.html
- yannis 17y agoYou can even write a scientific paper! Try this http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen/ http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen/ :)
- almost 17y agoThat may be unlikely to be frame-ups hoping to be NYTimesCo's subsidiary. It deserves more expensive to a blackhat SEO strategy. If having spammers link farms pointing at them. This is why Google would be careful when making these situations
- kwamenum86 17y agouh....clever?
- pbhjpbhj 17y agoThe fake blog is probably from a Markov generator. I've always liked that much more expensive to generate real content like it isn't that as a blackhat SEO strategy. However, it seems like the recent post about eHow and bingo cards like it seems like it seems like the recent post about eHow and bingo cards so there isn't that risk The fake blog is probably from a Markov generator. I've always liked that risk The fake blog is probably from a blackhat SEO strategy. However, it isn't that as a Markov generator.