11 ms·

Resize.ly – Images resized, responsive, and retina ready

50 points by jsingleton 11y ago

mtmail 11y ago
I'm in the market for such a solution and it's interesting how many services go stale or miscalculate their bandwidth costs (if they offer hosting) and close. Resize.ly is copyright 2013, still in beta and offer unlimited for $9. http://imagefly.io/ http://imagefly.io/ looks a bit more grown up but it's copyright 2013 as well, last blog post over two years ago, last tweet over a year ago. http://6px.io/ http://6px.io/ seems more active. I'm tending towards http://www.imgix.com/ http://www.imgix.com/ All solve resizing-as-service, I just want to make sure to use a service that's still around in a couple of years for my projects.
- JohnyLy 11y ago
  Thanks for those links (Especially the last one). Resize.ly is just beta, so let's see what they come up with in the near future. On another hand, I hope there will be a resizing/compressing service inspired by Pied Piper (Silicon Valley series) sometime soon.
- luckystarr 11y ago
  http://cloudinary.com/ http://cloudinary.com/ seem to be doing fine.
- reasonishy 11y ago
  Alternative: * Spin up a VPS somewhere for a few dollars a month. * Install thumbor
  - boyter 11y ago
    Sounds good till you get to maintenance and scaling. Thumbor isn't as install and forget if you value being able to recreate the environment from scratch, scale out, rotate and secure the keys, solve tmp directory issues, ensure availability etc... Having just finished several months of working with and tweaking thumbor for a large volume website I can see how just paying for a service would be appealing.
    - onion2k 11y ago
      Thumbor isn't as install and forget if you value being able to recreate the environment from scratch, scale out, rotate and secure the keys, solve tmp directory issues, ensure availability etc... Nothing is install-and-forget if you value those things, because valuing those things is the opposite of wanting install-and-forget software.
      - boyter 11y ago
        True. But if someone is asking to pay to take away the pain the probably do value some of those things, hence paying for some install and forget service.
    - mryan 11y ago
      Would you mind sharing some detail about the issues you had with tmp dirs and availability? I deployed Thumbor a few months ago and it's been pretty much install and forget. I'm curious about what issues I might have in future as it scales.
      - boyter 11y ago
        Sure. For the record the Thumbor cluster I was working on needed to have 100% uptime and be configured to mitigate any potentially DDoS situation even if the secret key was leaked. It also needed facial detection and GIF (animation) resizing support. The tmp directory is never emptied unless you restart the machine. So to get around this you have to write a cron job to remove the older downloaded and resized images. However in my load tests this caused issues with Thumbor and so I ended up having the cron job only delete files over a certain age. However this still leaves the possibility that Thumbor could fill up the entire disk and crash the machine. Other issues were having the ability to rotate the Thumbor key. This is somewhat supported by Thumbor, in that the previous keys images will still be available but the key rotation is not done for you. I was using AWS so stored the key in a protected s3 bucket and gave roles access to pull the key and when it detected it was modified restart Thumbor. The last an main issue was the ability to spin up a new version of Thumbor itself. In the time it took me to get it from development through to production the dependancies changed so much that facial detection broke halfway though. I fixed this initially by freezing the pip dependancies but then the underlying dependancies caused issue at a later day. In short I was unable to spin up a new version which was identical to the previous. Generally were I work we tear down and spin up fresh instances all the time so this was an issue. We resolved this by installing Thumbor in a docker container. Don't get me wrong. A big fan of Thumbor and it was the right solution for what I needed to do but these issues really made myself and others considering paying a 3rd party for a while.
  - anilgulecha 11y ago
    A better alternative is a simple wrapper over s3, and some lambda scripts generating resized images. No issues with scaling, and reasonably priced.
    - gingerlime 11y ago
      I like this idea. Any pointers for some lambda scripts that do this?
  - guiomie 11y ago
    My alternative is a digital ocean VPS with a nodejs server with the ImageMagick module. Super easy to use, but I'll say thumbnor looks like a good solution too. Thanks for the link!
- randall 11y ago
  Nearly anonymous "my friend works there" posts aren't a ton of help, but I'll just say my buddy Kelly (https://twitter.com/kellysutton https://twitter.com/kellysutton) works on Imigix, he used to work on this dropbox for PSDs thing (layervault) and he's awesome, so I'd tend to believe that imgix is awesome by association alone.
- gingerlime 11y ago
  We switched to imgix recently (after using pre-processed versions using carrierwave / ImageMagick / cloudfront), and it works pretty well for us. There were a few odd glitches setting up, but once it's up and running it seems to do really well. One neat feature of imgix is its auto format, which converts images to webp/progressive Jpeg on-the-fly based on the browser headers[0]. I'm not associated in any way with imgix, just a fairly new customer. [0]http://blog.imgix.com/post/90838796454/webp-jpeg-xr-progressive-jpg-support-w-auto http://blog.imgix.com/post/90838796454/webp-jpeg-xr-progress...
- diarmuidie 11y ago
  I'm working on a PHP based solution for some personal projects ATM. Feel free to check it out: https://github.com/diarmuidie/ImageRack https://github.com/diarmuidie/ImageRack The big difference between ImageRack and most others solutions is that you pre-define the available image manipulations templates on the server side (for example a template for thumbnails, large images, iPad sizes etc.). I'm not a fan of letting the client generate multiple versions of an image by changing the URL (i.e. http://resize.ly/450x150/http://resize.ly/img/kittens/kitty-1024x768.jpg http://resize.ly/450x150/http://resize.ly/img/kittens/kitty-...).
- joeshaw 11y ago
  I'm one of the developers of http://imagefly.io http://imagefly.io. We are still very much active and doing development on the service. We have paying customers and our own photo products depend heavily on the service. We clearly need to update the copyright info on the page and make some new blog posts!
dandare 11y ago
Why isn't this provided by the big coulds like AWS?
leni536 11y ago
My acid test for resizing (downscaling to be more precise): http://www.4p8.com/eric.brasseur/gamma-1.0-or-2.2.png http://www.4p8.com/eric.brasseur/gamma-1.0-or-2.2.png The resize.ly version (2x downscaled): http://resize.ly/256x128/http://www.4p8.com/eric.brasseur/gamma-1.0-or-2.2.png http://resize.ly/256x128/http://www.4p8.com/eric.brasseur/ga... It fails horribly for me. Most software fails too (try to downscale the original in your favorite browser!), but this somehow ruins the base background gray too somehow. Sorry for the test image being a little harsh, it's not mine (also some reading material how downscaling should be implemented): http://www.4p8.com/eric.brasseur/gamma.html http://www.4p8.com/eric.brasseur/gamma.html
- avinoth 11y ago
  What's happening actually? I wanted to learn image processing but always get hung up. Can you just give an quick note about what's happening here? or direct me to any links? thanks
  - leni536 11y ago
    I think my last link describes the problem accurately from the ground up. TL;DR the raw pixel values are typically not linearly proportional to the luminescence of the color channels. But a cone cell in the eye actually averages the luminescence of different areas if you look at a fine structured image from far away, so if you want to emulate the perception of the eye then you have to average luminescence values instead of raw pixel values. The conversion is well defined by the colorspaces in use. Most pictures on the Internet uses the sRGB colorspace, which is not linear. Color perception and colorspaces are actually not straightforward in the sense that naive algorithms often fail. But the basics are not that hard.
- mrbig4545 11y ago
  Nice one for that, I didn't know this existed! seems I pass this one ok, https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/138385/downscale-test https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/138385/downscale-test Thanks to https://metacpan.org/pod/Imager https://metacpan.org/pod/Imager Although I passed this one no problems, I find animated gifs to be the worst thing to resize, especially the ones where the changes are part of a layer over another layer e.g. look at this one in gimp/photoshop https://thisaintnews.com/static/user/pics/1218067200/1218395289-sonic.gif https://thisaintnews.com/static/user/pics/1218067200/1218395... layer two is just enough to cover layer one and make the hand move, the rest is transparent. but at least the layers are the same size some animated gifs have the new layer not the same canvas size as the layer underneath, so you have to adjust the layer offsets correctly or they end up all over the place Infact I have a few evil gifs for testing this https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/138386/test-gif-1 https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/138386/test-gif-1 https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/137264/test-gif-2 https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/137264/test-gif-2 https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/137265/test-gif-3 https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/137265/test-gif-3 https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/138387/test-gif-4 https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/138387/test-gif-4 I can't remember the exact differences, but I do remember they go from easy to hard to resize correctly
rndn 11y ago
A couple of stupid questions: (1) Aren't there already several providers of this kind of service? (2) If so, what does this service claim to do better? (3) How is image scaling hard enough to justify a business model?
- leni536 11y ago
  Image scaling is hard, too bad that these services don't do it actually better than anybody else (see my other comment).
lewisl9029 11y ago
Anyone aware of any promising client-side solutions for responsive images? I'm hoping to see something like the picture element suggested here: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2011/11/html5-semantics/ http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2011/11/html5-semantics/ <picture alt="angry pirate"> <source src=hires.png media="min-width:800px"> <source src=midres.png media="min-width:480px"> <source src=lores.png>  <img src=midres.png alt="angry pirate"> </picture> Would something like this be possible to implement with React or Web Components? Or will we have to wait for HTML6? In my opinion, responsive images really shouldn't be a server-side concern, much less something that should require a third party service.
- mrbig4545 11y ago
  have you looked at srcset? https://css-tricks.com/responsive-images-youre-just-changing-resolutions-use-srcset/ https://css-tricks.com/responsive-images-youre-just-changing...
  - lewisl9029 11y ago
    Beautiful! This is exactly what I was looking for. =)
    - mrbig4545 11y ago
      No problem, I only know this because I had to use it yesterday. It's not fully supported yet, but it's good enough as long as you keep using src as a fallback http://caniuse.com/#feat=srcset http://caniuse.com/#feat=srcset
- acdha 11y ago
  <picture> is available in about half of the shipped browsers (http://caniuse.com/#search=picture http://caniuse.com/#search=picture) and there's a robust polyfill available: https://github.com/scottjehl/picturefill https://github.com/scottjehl/picturefill
  - 11y ago
3lux 11y ago
For an open source alternative written in Go, with a Dockerfile to make deployments super easy see: https://github.com/pressly/imgry https://github.com/pressly/imgry We use it to scale 10million images / day across 3 c3.large boxes with ave response time of 120ms.
mrbig4545 11y ago
failed hard on this gif source https://thisaintnews.com/static/user/pics/1438214400/1438778535_3d-as-fuck.gif https://thisaintnews.com/static/user/pics/1438214400/1438778... resized http://resize.ly/cache/thisaintnews.com/11a454f11a5a6b091c84b57aead57b97/200x130.png http://resize.ly/cache/thisaintnews.com/11a454f11a5a6b091c84...
- altern8 11y ago
  scaling animated gifs..?
  - mrbig4545 11y ago
    it's a tricky task, but it can be done. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10054060 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10054060
jsingleton 11y ago
I didn't expect this to get so much attention or I'd have written some context. I came across this while researching solutions to the old thumbnails problem. It doesn't look like it took off or is maintained but I thought it was interesting. Image resizing is a hard problem. At a place I used to work at we wrote a custom distributed image thumbnail generation system for user supplied images. It was pretty complex and used a database and pub/sub message queueing to propagate changes from a SAN file system. The main issue was that the underlying image libraries weren't suited to running on a web server. It leaked memory like mad. This resulted in layers of sophisticated monitoring and automatic restart systems being built on top. It shouldn't have to be this hard. If a progressive format like JPEG2000 or WebP takes off then browsers can just download enough data to fill whatever pixels they need to fill. I have a lot of other thoughts on this but they can wait for a blog post. If anyone is interested?
justwannasing 11y ago
Hmm. I've been doing this for years on my server. Why is this needed if you know how to code? I don't understand. On top of that, they want you to pay to use their "cloud service"?
darrennix 11y ago
We switched to Cloudinary.com a few months ago. We're in love with them. They have a slew of integration libraries and support things like document to image conversion out of the box.
manigandham 11y ago
http://cloudinary.com http://cloudinary.com is the best at this. Just look at their customers list. They also handle video just as seamlessly and have a pretty generous free tier with a great control panel and useful manipulations (like recognizing faces). We've been using them for a while and everything has been perfect. http://rsz.io/ http://rsz.io/ is another great service that's free. You can use your own CDN in front of both to save costs and use your own bandwidth.
hlfw0rd 11y ago
Meh. Not impressive.
Kiro 11y ago
> Create a single hi-res image and Resize.ly will do the rest. You no longer have to mess with different image sizes. What does that mean? What does Resize.ly do exactly?
kitwalker12 11y ago
is the pricing better than imgix? Also, for as an opensource alternative, we use https://github.com/die-net/fotomat https://github.com/die-net/fotomat as a S3 proxy. It's very fast and scales well

50 points by jsingleton 11y ago

I'm in the market for such a solution and it's interesting how many services go stale or miscalculate their bandwidth costs (if they offer hosting) and close. Resize.ly is copyright 2013, still in beta and offer unlimited for $9. http://imagefly.io/ http://imagefly.io/ looks a bit more grown up but it's copyright 2013 as well, last blog post over two years ago, last tweet over a year ago. http://6px.io/ http://6px.io/ seems more active. I'm tending towards http://www.imgix.com/ http://www.imgix.com/ All solve resizing-as-service, I just want to make sure to use a service that's still around in a couple of years for my projects.

JohnyLy 11y ago
Thanks for those links (Especially the last one). Resize.ly is just beta, so let's see what they come up with in the near future. On another hand, I hope there will be a resizing/compressing service inspired by Pied Piper (Silicon Valley series) sometime soon.
luckystarr 11y ago
http://cloudinary.com/ http://cloudinary.com/ seem to be doing fine.
reasonishy 11y ago
Alternative: * Spin up a VPS somewhere for a few dollars a month. * Install thumbor
- boyter 11y ago
  Sounds good till you get to maintenance and scaling. Thumbor isn't as install and forget if you value being able to recreate the environment from scratch, scale out, rotate and secure the keys, solve tmp directory issues, ensure availability etc... Having just finished several months of working with and tweaking thumbor for a large volume website I can see how just paying for a service would be appealing.
  - onion2k 11y ago
    Thumbor isn't as install and forget if you value being able to recreate the environment from scratch, scale out, rotate and secure the keys, solve tmp directory issues, ensure availability etc... Nothing is install-and-forget if you value those things, because valuing those things is the opposite of wanting install-and-forget software.
    - boyter 11y ago
      True. But if someone is asking to pay to take away the pain the probably do value some of those things, hence paying for some install and forget service.
  - mryan 11y ago
    Would you mind sharing some detail about the issues you had with tmp dirs and availability? I deployed Thumbor a few months ago and it's been pretty much install and forget. I'm curious about what issues I might have in future as it scales.
    - boyter 11y ago
      Sure. For the record the Thumbor cluster I was working on needed to have 100% uptime and be configured to mitigate any potentially DDoS situation even if the secret key was leaked. It also needed facial detection and GIF (animation) resizing support. The tmp directory is never emptied unless you restart the machine. So to get around this you have to write a cron job to remove the older downloaded and resized images. However in my load tests this caused issues with Thumbor and so I ended up having the cron job only delete files over a certain age. However this still leaves the possibility that Thumbor could fill up the entire disk and crash the machine. Other issues were having the ability to rotate the Thumbor key. This is somewhat supported by Thumbor, in that the previous keys images will still be available but the key rotation is not done for you. I was using AWS so stored the key in a protected s3 bucket and gave roles access to pull the key and when it detected it was modified restart Thumbor. The last an main issue was the ability to spin up a new version of Thumbor itself. In the time it took me to get it from development through to production the dependancies changed so much that facial detection broke halfway though. I fixed this initially by freezing the pip dependancies but then the underlying dependancies caused issue at a later day. In short I was unable to spin up a new version which was identical to the previous. Generally were I work we tear down and spin up fresh instances all the time so this was an issue. We resolved this by installing Thumbor in a docker container. Don't get me wrong. A big fan of Thumbor and it was the right solution for what I needed to do but these issues really made myself and others considering paying a 3rd party for a while.
- anilgulecha 11y ago
  A better alternative is a simple wrapper over s3, and some lambda scripts generating resized images. No issues with scaling, and reasonably priced.
  - gingerlime 11y ago
    I like this idea. Any pointers for some lambda scripts that do this?
- guiomie 11y ago
  My alternative is a digital ocean VPS with a nodejs server with the ImageMagick module. Super easy to use, but I'll say thumbnor looks like a good solution too. Thanks for the link!
randall 11y ago
Nearly anonymous "my friend works there" posts aren't a ton of help, but I'll just say my buddy Kelly (https://twitter.com/kellysutton https://twitter.com/kellysutton) works on Imigix, he used to work on this dropbox for PSDs thing (layervault) and he's awesome, so I'd tend to believe that imgix is awesome by association alone.
gingerlime 11y ago
We switched to imgix recently (after using pre-processed versions using carrierwave / ImageMagick / cloudfront), and it works pretty well for us. There were a few odd glitches setting up, but once it's up and running it seems to do really well. One neat feature of imgix is its auto format, which converts images to webp/progressive Jpeg on-the-fly based on the browser headers[0]. I'm not associated in any way with imgix, just a fairly new customer. [0]http://blog.imgix.com/post/90838796454/webp-jpeg-xr-progressive-jpg-support-w-auto http://blog.imgix.com/post/90838796454/webp-jpeg-xr-progress...
diarmuidie 11y ago
I'm working on a PHP based solution for some personal projects ATM. Feel free to check it out: https://github.com/diarmuidie/ImageRack https://github.com/diarmuidie/ImageRack The big difference between ImageRack and most others solutions is that you pre-define the available image manipulations templates on the server side (for example a template for thumbnails, large images, iPad sizes etc.). I'm not a fan of letting the client generate multiple versions of an image by changing the URL (i.e. http://resize.ly/450x150/http://resize.ly/img/kittens/kitty-1024x768.jpg http://resize.ly/450x150/http://resize.ly/img/kittens/kitty-...).
joeshaw 11y ago
I'm one of the developers of http://imagefly.io http://imagefly.io. We are still very much active and doing development on the service. We have paying customers and our own photo products depend heavily on the service. We clearly need to update the copyright info on the page and make some new blog posts!

dandare 11y ago

Why isn't this provided by the big coulds like AWS?

leni536 11y ago

My acid test for resizing (downscaling to be more precise): http://www.4p8.com/eric.brasseur/gamma-1.0-or-2.2.png http://www.4p8.com/eric.brasseur/gamma-1.0-or-2.2.png The resize.ly version (2x downscaled): http://resize.ly/256x128/http://www.4p8.com/eric.brasseur/gamma-1.0-or-2.2.png http://resize.ly/256x128/http://www.4p8.com/eric.brasseur/ga... It fails horribly for me. Most software fails too (try to downscale the original in your favorite browser!), but this somehow ruins the base background gray too somehow. Sorry for the test image being a little harsh, it's not mine (also some reading material how downscaling should be implemented): http://www.4p8.com/eric.brasseur/gamma.html http://www.4p8.com/eric.brasseur/gamma.html

avinoth 11y ago
What's happening actually? I wanted to learn image processing but always get hung up. Can you just give an quick note about what's happening here? or direct me to any links? thanks
- leni536 11y ago
  I think my last link describes the problem accurately from the ground up. TL;DR the raw pixel values are typically not linearly proportional to the luminescence of the color channels. But a cone cell in the eye actually averages the luminescence of different areas if you look at a fine structured image from far away, so if you want to emulate the perception of the eye then you have to average luminescence values instead of raw pixel values. The conversion is well defined by the colorspaces in use. Most pictures on the Internet uses the sRGB colorspace, which is not linear. Color perception and colorspaces are actually not straightforward in the sense that naive algorithms often fail. But the basics are not that hard.
mrbig4545 11y ago
Nice one for that, I didn't know this existed! seems I pass this one ok, https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/138385/downscale-test https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/138385/downscale-test Thanks to https://metacpan.org/pod/Imager https://metacpan.org/pod/Imager Although I passed this one no problems, I find animated gifs to be the worst thing to resize, especially the ones where the changes are part of a layer over another layer e.g. look at this one in gimp/photoshop https://thisaintnews.com/static/user/pics/1218067200/1218395289-sonic.gif https://thisaintnews.com/static/user/pics/1218067200/1218395... layer two is just enough to cover layer one and make the hand move, the rest is transparent. but at least the layers are the same size some animated gifs have the new layer not the same canvas size as the layer underneath, so you have to adjust the layer offsets correctly or they end up all over the place Infact I have a few evil gifs for testing this https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/138386/test-gif-1 https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/138386/test-gif-1 https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/137264/test-gif-2 https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/137264/test-gif-2 https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/137265/test-gif-3 https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/137265/test-gif-3 https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/138387/test-gif-4 https://thisaintnews.com/view/picture/138387/test-gif-4 I can't remember the exact differences, but I do remember they go from easy to hard to resize correctly

rndn 11y ago

A couple of stupid questions: (1) Aren't there already several providers of this kind of service? (2) If so, what does this service claim to do better? (3) How is image scaling hard enough to justify a business model?

leni536 11y ago
Image scaling is hard, too bad that these services don't do it actually better than anybody else (see my other comment).

lewisl9029 11y ago

Anyone aware of any promising client-side solutions for responsive images? I'm hoping to see something like the picture element suggested here: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2011/11/html5-semantics/ http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2011/11/html5-semantics/ <picture alt="angry pirate"> <source src=hires.png media="min-width:800px"> <source src=midres.png media="min-width:480px"> <source src=lores.png>  <img src=midres.png alt="angry pirate"> </picture> Would something like this be possible to implement with React or Web Components? Or will we have to wait for HTML6? In my opinion, responsive images really shouldn't be a server-side concern, much less something that should require a third party service.

mrbig4545 11y ago
have you looked at srcset? https://css-tricks.com/responsive-images-youre-just-changing-resolutions-use-srcset/ https://css-tricks.com/responsive-images-youre-just-changing...
- lewisl9029 11y ago
  Beautiful! This is exactly what I was looking for. =)
  - mrbig4545 11y ago
    No problem, I only know this because I had to use it yesterday. It's not fully supported yet, but it's good enough as long as you keep using src as a fallback http://caniuse.com/#feat=srcset http://caniuse.com/#feat=srcset
acdha 11y ago
<picture> is available in about half of the shipped browsers (http://caniuse.com/#search=picture http://caniuse.com/#search=picture) and there's a robust polyfill available: https://github.com/scottjehl/picturefill https://github.com/scottjehl/picturefill
- 11y ago

3lux 11y ago

For an open source alternative written in Go, with a Dockerfile to make deployments super easy see: https://github.com/pressly/imgry https://github.com/pressly/imgry We use it to scale 10million images / day across 3 c3.large boxes with ave response time of 120ms.

mrbig4545 11y ago

failed hard on this gif source https://thisaintnews.com/static/user/pics/1438214400/1438778535_3d-as-fuck.gif https://thisaintnews.com/static/user/pics/1438214400/1438778... resized http://resize.ly/cache/thisaintnews.com/11a454f11a5a6b091c84b57aead57b97/200x130.png http://resize.ly/cache/thisaintnews.com/11a454f11a5a6b091c84...

altern8 11y ago
scaling animated gifs..?
- mrbig4545 11y ago
  it's a tricky task, but it can be done. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10054060 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10054060

jsingleton 11y ago

I didn't expect this to get so much attention or I'd have written some context. I came across this while researching solutions to the old thumbnails problem. It doesn't look like it took off or is maintained but I thought it was interesting. Image resizing is a hard problem. At a place I used to work at we wrote a custom distributed image thumbnail generation system for user supplied images. It was pretty complex and used a database and pub/sub message queueing to propagate changes from a SAN file system. The main issue was that the underlying image libraries weren't suited to running on a web server. It leaked memory like mad. This resulted in layers of sophisticated monitoring and automatic restart systems being built on top. It shouldn't have to be this hard. If a progressive format like JPEG2000 or WebP takes off then browsers can just download enough data to fill whatever pixels they need to fill. I have a lot of other thoughts on this but they can wait for a blog post. If anyone is interested?

justwannasing 11y ago

Hmm. I've been doing this for years on my server. Why is this needed if you know how to code? I don't understand. On top of that, they want you to pay to use their "cloud service"?

darrennix 11y ago

We switched to Cloudinary.com a few months ago. We're in love with them. They have a slew of integration libraries and support things like document to image conversion out of the box.

manigandham 11y ago

http://cloudinary.com http://cloudinary.com is the best at this. Just look at their customers list. They also handle video just as seamlessly and have a pretty generous free tier with a great control panel and useful manipulations (like recognizing faces). We've been using them for a while and everything has been perfect. http://rsz.io/ http://rsz.io/ is another great service that's free. You can use your own CDN in front of both to save costs and use your own bandwidth.

hlfw0rd 11y ago

Meh. Not impressive.

Kiro 11y ago

> Create a single hi-res image and Resize.ly will do the rest. You no longer have to mess with different image sizes. What does that mean? What does Resize.ly do exactly?

kitwalker12 11y ago

is the pricing better than imgix? Also, for as an opensource alternative, we use https://github.com/die-net/fotomat https://github.com/die-net/fotomat as a S3 proxy. It's very fast and scales well