3 ms·

I showered with it, and it convinced me. It does lack the mechanical blasting action of regular showers, which is good for removing caked mud. But that doesn't

by tlb 11y ago

I showered with it, and it convinced me. It does lack the mechanical blasting action of regular showers, which is good for removing caked mud. But that doesn't come up often in my life. I found it more pleasant and just as fast for normal feel-good, smell-good showering purposes.

strictnein 11y ago
> "It does lack the mechanical blasting action of regular showers, which is good for removing caked mud" Hmm, I need that, just due to playing with (and having) kids and doing yard work. I could imagine redoing a bathroom and having a shower large enough for a traditional shower head on one side, and this on the other.
- brock_r 11y ago
  Maybe they need to add a button that converts it to a normal spray?
  - pwinter28 11y ago
    We have added in a secondary mode which does exactly this, offers a more traditional, even forceful feel, yet still uses about 60% less water than a regular shower.
gozo 11y ago
How different is it from a normal mist shower head? I found those infuriating, but they do perform better than a normal shower head if you have low water pressure. I personally like the idea of recycling water better. Which potentially gives you even temperature, better pressure and water savings. http://www.amazon.com/Watersaving-Experience-7-setting-Handshower-Showerhead/dp/B00VIW9ZQE/ http://www.amazon.com/Watersaving-Experience-7-setting-Hands...