zxcvcxz

24 ms·

181.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
Angular two lost me.
182.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
I call it NSA/Windows.
183.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
This frankenstein contraptions isn't going to work correctly until they add so much bloat it's not even worth it.
184.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
>Winux I've deemed it "Frankenstein OS" because they've sewn a whole bunch of parts together to make an unwieldy monster that doesn't quite work as good as the individual pieces did on their own.
185.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
>I've found Windows to be the OS that "just works" and gets out of my way I've had the opposite experience. Windows does not "just work" and it certainly does not "stay out of the way". I have USB
186.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
How will they pick up the crowd who chooses their OS because it's mostly FOSS and not a branch of the NSA used for mass data collection? Most devs I know care about privacy and it was one of the main reasons they switched from Windows.
187.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
I'm not blocking that script and it's still looks like that for me. Firefox 45.0.1 64bit Fedora 23
188.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
That's why you need an open source toilet that runs Linux.
189.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
>can't pretend I wouldn't be super excited to run a Microsoft Linux on my dev machine Seeing as MS is basically a branch of the NSA I'm not excited about that at all. I might be slightly excited if MS went open source and
190.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
Frankenstein OS (Linux + Windows) is going to break every dev tool chain you can think of. I don't see how anyone in their right mind would think Frankenstein OS is a good dev platform. I guess if you don't mind having an unstable
191.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
>limited IDE and runtime support Key word: limited I don't believe MS will ever fully support Linux 100%. They will always make their software tooling more compatible with their OS even though they have the ability to create softwar
192.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
>having an MS proper Linux would be great. What you're describing will never happen. MS wants to keep .NET/etc development easiest on Windows. They have no incentive or plans to deliver the same support for developers on Linux
193.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
I believe there will be many hoops to jump through to use this as a development environment too, and the limitations of this ABI will be plenty.
194.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
I just see this as a headache for developers. I don't want or need a Linux ABI, I just want to run a Linux container on Windows (if I have to use windows, which I would prefer not to do). If node running on windows needs access to a da
195.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
Why don't you just use Linux in a VM on Windows? I don't really understand why native bash (and full Linux ABI) would make Windows a better development environment than just running a Linux VM. If you plan on using the Linux envir
196.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
If you can't develop with it on all platforms it sucks. Not to mention the job market for .NET devs is pretty shit and I don't know a single person who actually enjoys it.
197.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
If you don't mind having an extremely bloated OS, which is why I quit programming on Windows and switched to Linux in the first place. Now they've just added even more bloat and I imagine developing using the "linux environme
198.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
It doesn't sound much different than a built in VM with a some optimizations. Just more bloat for windows I suppose.
199.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
It seems to me that Linux is slightly faster on an SSD and a hell of a lot faster on an HDD than Windows 10 when it first boots up. I have the exact same problems the parent describes.
200.
Carly Fiorina Says We're Not Using the Right Algorithms to Catch Terrorists(gizmodo.com)
2 points by zxcvcxz 11y ago|1 comments
201.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
>Pretty sure even most people with CS degrees could not configure Linux. It certainly does not take a degree of any kind to "configure Linux". Not even if you're below average IQ.
202.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
Well I'm watching MSNBC right now and pretty much every commentator is talking about how the terrorists were communicating using encryption and suggesting the fact that criminals have the ability to communicate secretly is something ne
203.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
I've seen a lot of HNers suggesting that we must over react and ramp up the war on terrorism. I'm all for cutting off immigration, but how will ramping up the wars do us any good? I don't see how another ten years "fixin
204.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
I don't think anyone is saying that there should be no response, people just think we shouldn't over react. Closing off the borders and refusing to take more Middle Eastern refugees is a sane response, starting more wars is an i
205.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
>The real massive danger is constantly trying to downplay it. No, it's not. The danger is over reacting, as history has proven time and time again. Fear is not the answer.
206.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
But people like you who are over reacting are the people who are allowing the social fabric to be damaged.
207.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
While this is a horrible attack, they are completely right. Terrorism is not something that is happening everywhere and when we let our selves succumb to fear we risk over-reacting. The reason so many terrorists exist is in large part due t
208.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
So yeah I see some complaints about Linux, but there is no way Windows or OS X would have been a better choice for a product like this. Steam Machines are supposed to be the Android of the console world. Valve would have had to work closely
209.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
Sounds pretty bad to me.
210.
by zxcvcxz 11y ago
Why?

More ›