zx8080

31 ms·

751.
by zx8080 3y ago
> don't have them at all. Who? Customers?
752.
by zx8080 3y ago
Do they require the additional docs when you top up the account or when try using those money/transfer out?
753.
by zx8080 3y ago
There's a free market in the US, isn't it? Some would say, don't blame execs, they are products of the market, not the reason for it. How many of HN readers would refuse some large bonus?
754.
by zx8080 3y ago
Probably not a crimimal one. But imagine if a person cannot explain to tax agency some large sums of money flows.
755.
by zx8080 3y ago
Banks want to sink as much data from the consumer device as possible. Remember bank app wants a permission to access all files and calls and messages and location and physical sensors? They don't care about security other than for avoi
756.
by zx8080 3y ago
Why do they do it? Is it a reaction on regulator critique, or a plain "let's lock this account up to take some money" dumb (or smart?) profit-generation?
757.
by zx8080 3y ago
It's hard to believe a normal person would death-threat some random contact instead of blocking.
758.
by zx8080 3y ago
This could be a chatgpt prompt used to generate this project :)
759.
by zx8080 3y ago
Probably, both "benevolent monarchs" and non-corrupt democratic politicians do not exist in reality.
760.
by zx8080 3y ago
Isn't is because of a "free money" thing?
761.
by zx8080 3y ago
Repair shops are going to love Rivian. As they bring 30x more money for a single repair. The only thing is that an insurance will probably cost 30x (not only for Rivian cars owners!). So insurance will love such cars too.
762.
by zx8080 3y ago
Seems that the old one "Divide them to conquer separately" always works.
763.
by zx8080 3y ago
It would too suspicious if Google directly buys Fakespot (a control on which allows to manipulate any review autencity). So Mozilla, which is totally funded from Google money, buys them. A cookie consent on fakespot page states mainly Fakes
764.
by zx8080 3y ago
This will probably allow building a detailed model of every FF user (as Fakespot will be probably enabled by default). Not only browsing history (like in a failed Google Chrome FLoC attempt). Shopping interests, behavior on every page and s
765.
by zx8080 4y ago
Hey, why so negative! Lobbying is a hard work requiring coordination, expensive lawyers and tons of money. It's the only layer of protection for the society from a thoughtless legislation! /s
766.
by zx8080 4y ago
> first and last months rent. Just to be sure. Is this a smart name for what others call a 'deposit'?
767.
by zx8080 4y ago
What did Lucas do?
768.
by zx8080 4y ago
Lacking fundamentals is relatively not trivial to catch during an interview process.
769.
by zx8080 4y ago
Wow, ~1/3 subscriptions hard to cancel is a lot. Obstacles while cancelling subscriptions are obvious. That's easy money. Probably, unless regulated, the issue will not be fixed, in general.
770.
by zx8080 4y ago
What are bans in school? Do you mind share some as I feel completely out of context, living outside of the US.
771.
by zx8080 4y ago
Because expensive. It's the usual "buy low, sell high" story, unless forbidden.
772.
by zx8080 4y ago
There's nothing able protect customers from fake reviews in this world.
773.
by zx8080 4y ago
The main question is 'who is in charge?' for the decisions. Who gets punished with no bonus and a bad reputation or even go bankrupt if a company dies? Same responsibility barrier exists for the driverless cars adoption. In short,
774.
by zx8080 4y ago
The link requires logging in. Any quotes to be highlighted?
775.
by zx8080 4y ago
> ...when you have 1 player that is too good. It's not too good. It's just wealthiest. Because it holds ads market monopoly. Because it happens to be the popular search engine at the same time. But it's not the best. Firef
776.
by zx8080 4y ago
> The problem is nobody wants to make a hundred purchasing decisions per day. I wouldn't want to help hundreds of sites I visit every day to track me (with the payment system help). I have no doubts they will sell this info for some
777.
by zx8080 4y ago
Just to be sure. Is Ruff faster by lacking type checking? Also, does Ruff work well on codebase without type hints?
778.
Linux Kernel Spectre v2 SMT mitigations(github.com)
18 points by zx8080 4y ago|6 comments
779.
by zx8080 4y ago
It's sad that there are specific browser-oriented websites (and development processes, obviously) instead of the standards-oriented ones. (Sure, it's Chrome-oriented ones. We've seen similar previously with IE, by the way.) W
780.
by zx8080 4y ago
> to me it seems like most major trackers are moving/has already moved to things like canvas fingerprinting, WebAssembly fingerprinting etc. Also the upcoming WebGPU enabling by default in chrome will probably make it very simple to

More ›