zuzululu

5 ms·

31.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
Amazing. no humans are willing to do this type of work for under a hundred dollars like LLMs and would've taken a year or more. I think LLMs open up a great new vector for jailbreaking old devices or firmwares that no longer get factor
32.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
it prevents certain innovations to be derived from it but with LLMs I do think these licensing are pretty much moot. i still think it could've benefited by Apache 2.0 which more or less gets you to your goals
33.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
If you view this life as a simulation and that this is the only possible one you will inhibit, it all looks absurd for the very thing you mentioned, the snapshot of it alone suggests chaos stochastic properties with seemingly no order but t
34.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
interesting you used AGPL 3 licensing, are you planning a hosted version? would've been great with a more liberal license
35.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
I want code that is efficient, secure and cheap to produce. There is no way a human can compete with a network of agents doing that. Whatever edge you think exists is on a downward trend. Look at where we were in the days of GPT 4o vs now i
36.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
My point isn't that what you are doing is pointless or that you shouldn't enjoy what you do but that it ultimately holds very little economic value especially as someone in charge of hiring developers, their experience is more val
37.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
Sure but how many devs can sustain that level of efficiency around the clock and how much thought do you think their employers will give when the LLM tokens pay 1/100~1/1000th of the wage paid
38.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
> Being a code artisan is not gatekeeping. It means if you're used to being close to the metal and often know better than the compiler, Zig is for you. If you're not, use Rust. You are saying that if you are not a code artisan
39.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
Rust is quite slow but that is an interesting benefit but still not sure what the trade offs are, Rust has a huge mature ecosystem and there are lot of jobs for it. Are you able to ship faster with Zig vs Rust? How did you arrive at the 4x
40.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
with LLMs? syntax doesn't really matter anymore exactly because of what you mentioned in your last sentence.
41.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
As does C++ and other languages. What is so special about Zig that you cannot use LLMs with it? Please provide examples.
42.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
Can LLMs not write Zig code ? I'm not really understanding your explanation for why we can write other languages with LLM but not Zig here. > Rust trades the low-level clarity for compiler-enforced safety. If you're not a code
43.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
I'm shipping in Rust but any reason to do so in Zig ? What does it offer over Rust ? Something tangible benefit to end user or developer using ai assisted development ?
44.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
you really have to go out of your way to figure out how to install graphene and on top of that you have duress code and its pretty much painting a red target on yourself across borders the authorities dont care about your edward snowden ins
45.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
are you saying that you can do a better job than frontier models from OpenAI and Anthropic and Google when it comes to coding something that is free from zero days and exploits while matching its ability to ship feature at the rate a compet
46.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
99% of ppl would not hesitate than risk detainment > Would you care to post screenshots of your inboxes and browser history for the class? i would be since i dont have anything to hide, do you have anything to hide or find embarassing ?
47.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
But what did Mr. Tunick had to hide tho im serious what did he have (illegal?) that he chose to delete it?? i dont think it was ideological.... i bring a new device just for traveling and wireguard rdp (iphone mirror) into my home desktop
48.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
huh that is crazy fast, demo ?
49.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
why is there so many weird flat lines is that an artifact? this is fascinating wish there was a 360 VR version of this truly immense scale
50.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
this is cool but for agent scenarios unless an LLM bakes in the speech tokens directly, the latency is lost to inference, and this is what makes openai's voice model so interesting also sweet spot is under 150ms so the remainder is inf
51.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
No one. Probably a fine tho and maybe accelerate reguations. Intent is pretty important here so the user would have to prove that they didn't purposely disguise their prompt as non-nefarious which should be easy and then it stops at #2
52.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
now if something like this released for amazon kindle i would dust it off and start actually using the device again
53.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
It's critical to understand the fundamentals on your own and that is different from AI being used in public. Sure school doesn't have as much value as it used to but it was always more about social credit or a certification that y
54.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
what would be cool is an llms.txt that i can feed to use these as most try to use React when they could just use html
55.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
again "destroy" is not accurate. to scan massive amounts of books you have to cut the binding part as feed scanning has been around for ages there are non destructive scanning options but they are nowhere as fast and prone to erro
56.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
indeed it has anybody know whats going on at openai ??
57.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
i dont know what the hell is going on lately i pop in to issues or discussions and its agents talking to each other or telling me what PR to merge I mean i use AI too but was taken back when an agent popped up dictating what i should do and
58.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
I share the same sentiment here, pseudocode is just basically prompts all over the place, rather what I think is much more valuable are oracles that can only come after the LLM has written something not before it.
59.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
i think this is a fascinating cognitive dissonance on display: > there is no thinking, no meditation, you’re delegating the thinking to a machine, you’re just barking what you want at it, incessantly, endlessly. why do you think software
60.
by zuzululu 2mo ago
very worrying study, essentially its a digital->neurochemistry chasm crossing substance that uses the 2 senses. all more reasons to heavily discourage the usage of short form content , we might require regulations against what is essenti

More ›