zorpner

62 ms·

631.
by zorpner 13y ago
> heavy dose of fiber to balance out the glycemic index. Result: sugar rush followed by a nasty crash Good God, man, that is not at all what fiber does, and has nothing to do with the role of fiber in diet. Please stop consuming this be
632.
by zorpner 13y ago
> But do not accuse me of being sexist. But you are. So am I -- we all are. Our culture and society are so riddled with pervasive sexism that we all exhibit sexist behavior at baseline, and the responsible thing to do is try and ident
633.
by zorpner 13y ago
Precisely correct -- the real issue is that Google _didn't_ kill Reader in this manner. They subsidized its existence with their other products, undermining the support of other feed readers on the market, until they decided not to.
634.
by zorpner 13y ago
Fair point -- I was being hyperbolic. Rather than "a topic you know nothing about", it would be more accurate to say "a topic which people (namely the parties which assessed the fine) who are demonstrably qualified have already passed judg
635.
by zorpner 13y ago
I'd love to learn more about your background -- trail maintenance planner? Ecological impact study coordinator? Surely it's something that would allow you to make an authoritative statement about what does or does not damage a piece of pr
636.
by zorpner 13y ago
That's explicitly contrary to the HN guidelines, as is your comment. ...as is this comment of mine. I'll show myself out.
637.
by zorpner 14y ago
It isn't a violation of freedom to be filmed in public, that's completely legal. "legal" is hardly the same thing as "[not] a violation of freedom"; in fact they're often orthogonal.
638.
by zorpner 14y ago
Where on the resume would you recommend putting that information?
639.
by zorpner 14y ago
Maybe you could start by dismissing their experience (provided as an example , not as a sum total of the problem) and asserting that they need to provide more data and evidence? It's a pretty good way of marginalizing women in tech if tha
640.
by zorpner 14y ago
Do you really not understand how fundamentally anti-open-access Elsevier is? Have you not seen what happens to the other companies they absorb? Many of us have experience in this particular field and it's not a pleasant one. Your official
641.
by zorpner 14y ago
The counterattack to this is to transfer small amounts of the "tainted" btc to the addresses of the people who are leading the effort (or to outgoing addresses for large exchanges, faucets, and so on). This is effectively the same as laund
642.
by zorpner 14y ago
> Processing for health is a bit different from processing for cost. In the sense that history is littered with people attempting to apply cross-domain knowledge to processing for health and failing utterly, that's absolutely true.
643.
by zorpner 14y ago
Screw you, seriously. You want to remove childbearers from the workforce? You want to reduce everyone's employment experiences by diminishing the market of employees and ideas? You want your ten bucks a year so that you can say you don't
644.
by zorpner 14y ago
The bar for you is much lower. It may not even occur at the interview stage -- many studies have been done that demonstrate a lower rate of interviews granted to identical applications with a "foreign-sounding" name. The insistence on "har