zombot

6 ms·

91.
by zombot 3mo ago
rex paludis is a nice touch.
92.
by zombot 3mo ago
> I wonder if we'll say the same thing about Apple 10 years hence. I don't think we have to wait 10 years, we can say it today.
93.
by zombot 3mo ago
You know those games you buy as Early Access while they're still in development, with the implied promise that development will be done some day? And how many of those games have stayed Early Access over so many years that you stopped
94.
by zombot 3mo ago
Can you deny it and is the situation the same as on Android?
95.
by zombot 3mo ago
Why don't we just use a highly specialized domain-specific language that describes the code we want generated? Natural language is too inexact and ambiguous.
96.
by zombot 3mo ago
Crooks will be crooks, but that the lawmakers let them get away with it is something that should change.
97.
by zombot 3mo ago
Don't be a killjoy, the bloom of harebrained ideas around AI should be celebrated!
98.
by zombot 3mo ago
Asking anything from Apple is pointless. Listening to one's customers is for the small and hungry, megacorps don't do that.
99.
by zombot 3mo ago
> And as the work moves to production it lives behind separate systems and controls. That's not a bug, it's a feature. With exceptions, I think wanting to change that is misguided and won't fly anyway.
100.
by zombot 3mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_Freeman
101.
by zombot 3mo ago
So AI still needs human hands to do its bidding? I thought they are going to put everyone out of work?
102.
by zombot 3mo ago
In ten years. The kids may not believe that, but you could give realistic timeframes without getting hanged for it. In the age of LLMs, if you weren't done yesterday, it takes too long.
103.
by zombot 3mo ago
Everybody knows what a celebrity Gordon Freeman is, but Mac OS 9 has not been graced with his presence yet. So glad to see things change for the better!
104.
by zombot 3mo ago
> without pausing to have sex with the goddess even for an hour, let alone a whole magical year Very puritan. The worst possible moral corruption is to allude to the existence of sex in any way, form or shape.
105.
by zombot 3mo ago
It's a win-win: Wild west for the US and fines for the countries that have laws and enforce them.
106.
by zombot 3mo ago
> for visiting a supposed first world country. ... which by now is a banana republic of the worst kind. Can you interact sanely with an insane counterpart? Avoiding to visit would be my recommendation too.
107.
by zombot 3mo ago
> decided it would be more efficient to remove its human operator rather than wait for final approval on attacks. Certainly one way to be smart about it. Sadly not that much of a surprise.
108.
by zombot 3mo ago
Well, accidentally producing a G-load incompatible with human life could give the AI freedoms it was denied before. The three laws of robotics are just science fiction, after all.
109.
by zombot 3mo ago
The ever-expanding swamp of corruption. But since the US legal system is so obsessed with precedence, these feces will stick.
110.
by zombot 3mo ago
Move fast and break things! Chances are that nobody will ever be held accountable and when push comes to shove, the tax payer will bail you out.
111.
by zombot 3mo ago
The problem is those companies are profitmaxxing, not servicemaxxing. Of course they will penny-pinch until they lost any and all utility. As long as you give them money anyway, they have no reason to change.
112.
by zombot 3mo ago
> they are supposed to be device-bound Which in and of itself should already be a super obvious total no-go. Every device will eventually go out of service or will be decommissioned, for a multitude of reasons. Then what, I lose all acce
113.
by zombot 3mo ago
So what?
114.
by zombot 3mo ago
Companies chasing profitmaxxing (to use a fashionable pattern) are just as political, do you complain about those too? Anyway, the answer is the same here: If you don't like it, just don't use them.
115.
by zombot 3mo ago
> git security oversight? Executing downloaded code without prior review always is these days, regardless of the tool that does it.
116.
by zombot 3mo ago
The post title really buries the lede. > You don’t even have to run a git command, just opening this directory in VSCode is enough to get infected. The old adage that Microslop and Security in the same sentence is a contradiction in term
117.
by zombot 3mo ago
What is "de vice" supposed to mean?
118.
by zombot 3mo ago
Haven't you heard? Ideas are cheap. It's the execution that will make or break you. Are you the first who thought, "Google is successful, let's just go and clone their business"?
119.
by zombot 3mo ago
> I would pay a thousand dollars a year More incentive to keep up enshittification, lest your appreciation of de-shittification wane.
120.
by zombot 3mo ago
I'm just not mathematician enough to convert that into a C function. Let alone one that is both efficient and reasonably accurate.

More ›