Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zodiac
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
56 ms
·
571.
▲
by
zodiac
10y ago
> I'm saying that only two participants in a space does not typically yield the benefits of true competition. The word "cartel" has a specific meaning that is different from "the opposite of true competition"
572.
▲
by
zodiac
10y ago
Since fraud is a crime, my answer would have to be "when it's proven in a court of law".
573.
▲
by
zodiac
10y ago
Are you suggesting all health records should be available to the public?
574.
▲
by
zodiac
10y ago
It's a joke
575.
▲
by
zodiac
10y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_random_number_generat...
576.
▲
by
zodiac
10y ago
He didn't blame docker
577.
▲
by
zodiac
10y ago
Surely the doctors who wrote this know more than you do and have considered this possibility? That doesn't mean they're automatically right, but your first reaction should be "what studies was this advice based on?" rath
578.
▲
by
zodiac
10y ago
> It is not uncommon for moderate length sentences - say 20 or 30 words in length - to have hundreds, thousands, or even tens of thousands of possible syntactic structures. Does "possible" mean "syntactically valid" h
579.
▲
by
zodiac
10y ago
I think Syntaxnet is just using the NN to guide search instead of doing end-to-end parsing. That said, you can feed "sequences of stuff" into recurrent neural nets! See https://papers.nips.cc/paper/5346-sequ
580.
▲
by
zodiac
10y ago
Is your work available somewhere? I would love to play with something like it.
581.
▲
by
zodiac
10y ago
> Any recommendation for an intro book I could grab to read in my spare time? Unfortunately I think the field suffers from a lack of such books. 1. You could try Steven Pinker's "The Language Instinct", although it's
582.
▲
by
zodiac
10y ago
Yes, of course your "right mate" example is also grammatically correct. The point is that people routinely and naturally do the complicated transformation to "will the man who has written the book be followed?", and that
583.
▲
by
zodiac
10y ago
No, the academic consensus is pretty much the opposite. For example by trying to rigorously state the way we form yes/no sentences in english - the process that converts "the man who has written the book will be followed" to
584.
▲
by
zodiac
10y ago
Then why was F# included?
585.
▲
by
zodiac
11y ago
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
586.
▲
by
zodiac
11y ago
He has a blog post about it - http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=2620
587.
▲
by
zodiac
11y ago
"speed of light" normally means "speed of light in a vacuum" (eg see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light )
588.
▲
by
zodiac
11y ago
Now that spdustin's post is the top post, that's pretty confusing...
589.
▲
by
zodiac
11y ago
The function it minimizes is called the "loss function", and its value for the training and test sets are shown in the upper right area. AFAICT the site doesn't say how it's computed, but I think it's average square
590.
▲
by
zodiac
11y ago
61as is not the same as 61a
591.
▲
by
zodiac
11y ago
It seems like when he passes deriv=True in line 36 the first argument is the output of a previous nonlin, so it actually is the correct derivative.
592.
▲
Minecraft Clone in PyGame and OpenGL
(github.com)
3 points
by
zodiac
11y ago
|
0 comments
593.
▲
by
zodiac
11y ago
Did you see a significant accuracy increase over using tesseract?
594.
▲
by
zodiac
11y ago
Stanford Parser ( http://nlp.stanford.edu:8080/parser/index.jsp ) actually parses it correctly! (ROOT (S (NP (NP (PRP$ my) (JJ complete) (NN shock)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP
595.
▲
by
zodiac
11y ago
So your answer should have been "ML" :p
596.
▲
by
zodiac
11y ago
> the goalpost on what is "true AI" shifts to be something that computers can't do yet while I agree that this does happen, I don't think it did in this case - that is, I don't remember anyone saying that they wo
597.
▲
by
zodiac
11y ago
Calling for someone to return and stand trial is different from calling for someone to be assasinated
598.
▲
by
zodiac
11y ago
> How is it ensured that this is a fair game given the time constraints? Both players get the same time controls, seems fair to me But if you're saying humans might fare better against computers in a game with a longer time control,
599.
▲
by
zodiac
11y ago
> its programmers gave it the ability to improve by playing against itself Good chess programs definitely use self-play to improve themselves, eg to tune parameters and heuristics.
600.
▲
by
zodiac
11y ago
Well, by that logic, why can't you describe Lee Sedol as applying an "improved tree search" that happens to have really good move selection heuristics and static board evaluation function as well? After all, all good human Go
More ›