zodiac

46 ms·

481.
by zodiac 10y ago
C11 isn't C++
482.
by zodiac 10y ago
I never really understood this distinction... why can't you similarly say that "you should be able to do whatever you want <with your ability to view the performance> as long as it is legally allowed"?
483.
by zodiac 10y ago
I don't have suggestions for specific people but my favorite episodes so far were ones where the founders went more in-depth into their industries; eg Docker, Plaid, Flexport. Also enjoyed the ones where they talk about how they got t
484.
by zodiac 10y ago
Cities can grow, you know. > future warfare
485.
by zodiac 10y ago
> I can't yet explain why Your comment and simulation prompted me to attempt an explanation of where danielvf's analysis is incorrect, which I've posted here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12941330
486.
by zodiac 10y ago
> but it's definitely some kinda recursive formula where you have to assume the other guy is also playing the optimal strategy. I think it can be solved by searching for a pure strategy nash equilibrium
487.
by zodiac 10y ago
The problem with your analysis is that "go for the highest value" is not equivalent to "maximize expected value of the number you end up with" For example, consider a similar game where you draw and then optionally re-dr
488.
by zodiac 10y ago
I'm curious, why don't you run findbugs directly rather than (I presume) paying Coverity?
489.
Terminal renderer for Three.js(github.com)
1 points by zodiac 10y ago|0 comments
490.
by zodiac 10y ago
Waiting for coordinated disclosure should not delay disclosure indefinitely, though. Google decided on 7 days as per https://security.googleblog.com/2013/05/disclosure-timeline-...
491.
by zodiac 10y ago
Why not shouldn't instead of whole milk?
492.
by zodiac 10y ago
Yes, I probably should have added "in equal temperament, ...". I would say that most of music theory assumes equal temperament because it's the simplest to deal with from a theory point of view, because it allows you to modul
493.
by zodiac 10y ago
I think Linus argued that the second version is more understandable. In fact if you read the article there's no claim being made that the second version is more efficient, and I don't think it is
494.
by zodiac 10y ago
I've read that you should treat IDs as strings anyway because you want to discourage incrementing IDs, adding IDs together etc. Anything else you want to do with integer IDs, e.g. comparing, can be done with sting IDs as well.
495.
by zodiac 10y ago
Yep that's true.
496.
by zodiac 10y ago
Yes, but a musician would (reasonably) say, for example, "this song is in CM, not am". I'm trying to say that keys are traditionally defined to be more than "what notes are used"
497.
by zodiac 10y ago
Counter-counter nit pick: it's still not accurate because a piece that stays in C Major all the way through can still use notes outside of the C Major scale (eg passing notes) Also I would say "X is simply Y" means "all
498.
by zodiac 10y ago
I like this! I've always wanted to build a music theory textbook (like Laitz) where the examples could be played. > When a song says that it is in the key of C Major, or D Minor, or A Harmonic, etc. this is simply telling you which
499.
by zodiac 10y ago
I'm sorry for being wrong then, but I'm still a bit confused - which part of the article is inaccurate? > Its central sin is that it obscures the mundane, industrial-based reasons for the tuning standard's emergence. The a
500.
by zodiac 10y ago
No I think the person I was replying doesn't know that the article dismisses the conspiracy theory. I might be wrong > I have no idea why this laughable article/idea persists
501.
by zodiac 10y ago
The second sentence makes no such claim. If you scroll further down you'll see > Why do we use A = 440 Hz? (spoiler: no Nazis)
502.
by zodiac 10y ago
Did you read the whole article?
503.
by zodiac 10y ago
Where did the article that nazis were involved?
504.
by zodiac 10y ago
I think you can get self study versions of the assignments off the textbook web page
505.
by zodiac 10y ago
I read danluu's first two paragraphs as making the argument that "comments on HN are bad, but better than comments on any other online community", instead of as trying to distinguish between meanness and technical correctness
506.
by zodiac 10y ago
Uh, did you read his second paragraph? > And yet, I haven’t found a public internet forum with better technical commentary.
507.
by zodiac 10y ago
Did you read the article at all? It contains no support for your claim that > If Thiel donates ... to Trump's campaign, then he effectively is saying what Trump is saying.
508.
by zodiac 10y ago
I'm curious, what do you do at work and what kinds of algorithms do you bump into?
509.
by zodiac 10y ago
Personally I use my backend (rails, flask, etc) just to expose an API and react in the frontend, it's a pretty clean separation
510.
by zodiac 10y ago
What makes going to court on patent cases so expensive?

More ›