zodiac

48 ms·

421.
by zodiac 10y ago
I didn't ask a yes/no question, I asked what apple's decision was
422.
by zodiac 10y ago
Do you have some links? Curious to try it out myself
423.
by zodiac 10y ago
Why? I could easily imagine a site you could go to to test if your own site works on IE6 or something, it would be useful for some people
424.
by zodiac 10y ago
So what is Apple's decision about what code is?
425.
by zodiac 10y ago
How do out of state students "push out" in state students?
426.
by zodiac 10y ago
We're working on moving more functionality to a REST API - there's already some code for this in master :)
427.
by zodiac 10y ago
Well, I'm asking you to tell me why you think your thing is a "virtual DOM". And your only response on this thread is "this is a virtual DOM, because that is what the expression means". Why is it what the expression
428.
by zodiac 10y ago
No it's not stupid - your etymology makes much less sense to me. DOM in virtual DOM refers to the tree that browsers use internally and provide an API against, not just any tree like structure that can be serialized to HTML (which seem
429.
by zodiac 10y ago
The definitions are important. I agree with your message (your thing is better than say rails templating) but virtual DOM basically means "react-style virtual DOM, implemented in client side JavaScript, with fast diff support, used to
430.
by zodiac 10y ago
Hmm, what word means it unambiguously?
431.
by zodiac 10y ago
What word currently means what "literally" used to mean (ie non-metaphorically)? I'm fine with words changing their meanings but in this case it seems to needlessly leave a hole in the language.
432.
by zodiac 10y ago
Well, that seems to me to be because they provided an alternative to patches that works a lot better for me and the projects I contribute to, and I can't blame them for it.
433.
by zodiac 10y ago
I meant it doesn't feel real to me in a subjective sense, and of course I acknowledge other people might not feel the same way.
434.
by zodiac 10y ago
There are a small number of people who think it's obviously false! (I'm not one of them). And a larger number who think it's not obviously true nor obviously false.
435.
by zodiac 10y ago
For sure - as I understand it in most formulations you throw out lots of sets but keep all the finite sets of natural numbers, the set of even numbers, the set of prime numbers etc One thing I never found satisfactory is that any axiom syst
436.
by zodiac 10y ago
I've always found dedekinds construction (where sqrt 2 is represented by the set of rationals {x in Q : x^2 < 2}) to be a nice natural place where powersets of countable infinite sets come up (in addition to being a great way to con
437.
by zodiac 10y ago
How many sets of natural numbers are there? An uncountable number. Of course, you could throw out some axioms so that you create an axiom system in which I can't define such a thing as "a subset of the natural numbers", but s
438.
by zodiac 10y ago
How did they "kill patches"?
439.
by zodiac 10y ago
> So 10% margin [citation needed]
440.
by zodiac 10y ago
> the police can simply hire anyone who is not a LEO to conduct a warrantless search on their behalf. It's clearly illegal for private individual A to search the computer of private individual B without B's consent though
441.
by zodiac 10y ago
Well the metallic state has a pretty precise definition, presumably the oxygen in stars exists in that state. (Whereas oxygen in air does not)
442.
by zodiac 10y ago
Well, everything has some amount of implied/customary prerequisites. You wouldn't complain if a books "Introduction to Metaprogramming in Ruby" or "Introduction to C++ templates" didn't teach you programmi
443.
by zodiac 10y ago
Could you share more about what you loved? I've heard good things about Tokyo but the comparison to SF, NYC etc is new to me and intriguing
444.
by zodiac 10y ago
> Specifically, a number n is interesting if there is some predicate P(x) which is true only for n. Well, if you read the "every number is interesting" "proof", this clearly doesn't capture the proof's crite
445.
by zodiac 10y ago
The airline discussed in the article are not weighing passengers in other to charge them a different amount, though
446.
by zodiac 10y ago
> the 2to3 part of the PEP was a false promise that gave ammo to Python 2 fans The PEP (3105) doesn't actually mention 2to3 anywhere, it just says that the fact that print is a statement (ie handled explicitly in the language syntax
447.
by zodiac 10y ago
The concepts of "text" and "array of bytes" should have been separated from the beginning, as they're distinct enough concepts. It's good that they separated them in python 3 but unfortunate that it causes prob
448.
by zodiac 10y ago
In python, functions are called using parentheses, so "make print a function" implies "require parentheses in calls to print". It would be weird to create a special case for the "functions are called using paranthes
449.
by zodiac 10y ago
In almost every city I've lived in, buses are much more "fine-grained" than trains. It's just too expensive to build rails to the same density as roads.
450.
by zodiac 10y ago
Bikeshed, Accidental Tech Podcast and Changelog

More ›