zodPod

9 ms·

61.
by zodPod 9y ago
And now, instead of us having to actively install them, they're just forcing them on us every time we go to a page! The EU and their stupid cookie warning laws don't help either. "Close this footer bar so you can see the nex
62.
by zodPod 9y ago
I think they mean that a third of the users but holy shit is that a confusing sentence. That's such a hilarious catch!
63.
by zodPod 9y ago
It's horrible isn't it?! It's insane that companies thing they can just keep abusing our attention!
64.
by zodPod 9y ago
That seems like a ton of effort. I know coal burns well but is it really worth that kind of effort in that quantity? (This isn't scrutinizing I'm just curious if this was a practice that was fruitful or if it was just kids think
65.
by zodPod 9y ago
I didn't realize that was a requirement for something being standard...
66.
by zodPod 9y ago
I think the biggest problem Swype had (once it published) was probably ignoring its user base. I was one of the early adopters when it showed up on the play market and I loved it. It was one of the bigger available apps at the time so I g
67.
by zodPod 9y ago
Yeah I get a lot of mistypes but it still feels a lot faster than peck typing. I can also do it while I'm not really looking which is nice on a non-tactile keyboard.
68.
by zodPod 9y ago
Sorry for this I am not experiencing it so maybe I'm completely wrong but these people seem to be overblowing this a lot. Health effects? I mean, it's a hum. Sure you can't find the source but heaters hum, ACs hum, cars go
69.
by zodPod 9y ago
Seriously! It always drove me nuts that they sent emails when you didn't check your facebook regularly too. I used to get so many damn emails. "This person shared this." "This person liked this" etc and I didn&#x2
70.
by zodPod 9y ago
Yeah I'd say that hurts the people who want to stay there too. If I search for a specific town I want places near the town not places near the biggest hub.
71.
by zodPod 9y ago
I thought they had just moved their ops to China because there were less regulations?
72.
by zodPod 9y ago
It's actually worse now because there's no easy way to block them!
73.
by zodPod 9y ago
This please. I was expecting an interesting article about why pixels are outdated and possible new displays or something and it turned out to be some huge piece about CSS?
74.
by zodPod 9y ago
It's funny you say that because when you see deletions of it it's typically a copyright claim. I'm not sure if they're claiming ownership of the person's face or using the face that they're typically stealing a
75.
by zodPod 9y ago
This! One of the most ridiculous notions in articles about this when it first started coming out was "We should ban this technology!" and reddit started deleting threads that contained links to download the scripts and apps. Do t
76.
by zodPod 9y ago
If it can be faked, is it really evidence? I mean, you're worrying about people not believing assertions at that point. This is already something that can be faked just not by the masses yet and not easily. You should always look
77.
by zodPod 9y ago
Something that comes up a lot on the deepfakes sub is the notion that this should make people more skeptical. They use the phrase "If anything can be real, nothing is real" and I think it makes a lot of sense.
78.
by zodPod 9y ago
Thank you for this clarification! I had just found some more information as well I had misunderstood what I was reading prior to this!
79.
by zodPod 9y ago
I'm sorry I believe my initial understanding was wrong. The time frame is still correct but I thought it was feeding but after you asked this it made me doubt myself and upon looking it up it's a different reason. They feed immed
80.
by zodPod 9y ago
There is also a window of time between when a tick attaches and when it can transmit disease. The ticks don't transmit disease until they have spent some time feeding so if you catch the tick within the first 24hrs or so you should be
81.
by zodPod 9y ago
Man you're not kidding! I thought the article ended at least 3 different times. Yikes!
82.
by zodPod 9y ago
I agree I was just trying to understand it further. I've always thought the idea of modeling the world was really interesting but it's always been a tad abstract to me so I was trying to get a little insight into it.
83.
by zodPod 9y ago
I really think it'd be more fun to watch it in some ways. Like in FPS I'm typically "anonymous guy" or "random name given by the creators". If it was me watching myself in some random movie I think it'd
84.
by zodPod 9y ago
Number 3 is really exciting to me. Think about every movie making you the star of the action. That'd be insane!
85.
by zodPod 9y ago
"Listen up macaque, look at this black dot here."
86.
by zodPod 9y ago
Wow! I never really thought of Medium in the same realm as Xanga or Livejournal but you're absolutely right. It's crazy to think that people are moving to it. LiveJournal and Xanga were always kind of a stepping stone back in
87.
by zodPod 9y ago
Can I ask what your goal is when highlighting? Is it based on the word or is it so you don't lose your place or what? I only ask because I don't do it but I sometimes find it difficult to read large amounts of text on screen and I
88.
by zodPod 9y ago
I agree with this a lot. I barely take note of the author or their site when I read stuff on Medium. So it makes a lot of sense if you want people to read the stuff you write but it seems to make much less sense from a marketing perspecti
89.
by zodPod 9y ago
Without a rule about altitude changes or something how would you get a spiral from this rather than just a circle?
90.
by zodPod 9y ago
You really think Apple isn't selling your data? http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2017/11/02/apple_pla...

More ›