zobzu

1080 ms·

1. 2611.▲
   by zobzu 15y ago

   It's still valid if the entire volume is encrypted that way, aka the disk is 100% random data, then nothing will stand out. The volume might have been deleted by dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sdb (for example) in order to wipe the data and mak
2. 2612.▲
   by zobzu 15y ago

   I don't think you understand their motives. Yes Mozilla takes money from Google, it does not make Mozilla Google does it? Mozilla has no share holders, no one to report to, and certainly they do not report to Google. Google pays Mozilla for
3. 2613.▲
   by zobzu 15y ago

   not storing the password in sql has nothing to do with obscurity. In fact, it's smart. You do not understand what "security through obscurity" means. Following your train of though, we should display the salt and the hash publicly. That is
4. 2614.▲
   by zobzu 15y ago

   SCTP anyone?
5. 2615.▲
   by zobzu 15y ago

   rather bad lol most of it is a Chrome and Android advertisement also.
6. 2616.▲
   by zobzu 15y ago

   Many people actually like to blame Firefox for imaginary problems since it's not the new kid on the block anymore. Likewise, IE9 ain't bad. This explains that ;-)
7. 2617.▲
   by zobzu 15y ago

   Unfortunately you do sound like a Chrome dev or promoter. Chrome's way ain't bad. Firefox way ain't bad, and it's their first iteration of their new development and release strategy. Firefox's extension incompatibility comes from something