zobzu

37 ms·

1. 421.▲
   by zobzu 11y ago

   exactly. 45% is actually pretty near the maximum :/
2. 422.▲
   by zobzu 11y ago

   i pay 45% tax in the usa. time to move ;)
3. 423.▲
   by zobzu 11y ago

   Exciting times!
4. 424.▲
   by zobzu 11y ago

   its not about speed its about power. if hardware isnt even instructed to go into sleep mode for example, there will be large differences.. which tends to happen on macbooks running windows.
5. 425.▲
   by zobzu 11y ago

   it doesnt matter theyre not windows pcs theyre macosx pcs. its well known the windows mac drivers arent that great. testing a dell, a lenevo, and the ms surface sounds more like the target for windows doesnt it?
6. 426.▲
   by zobzu 11y ago

   Its seems the defacto standard is to assume the world runs osx, but windows still is the most installed os. Might be interesting to test the world popular browsers on the most popular os non?
7. 427.▲
   by zobzu 11y ago

   Specially on a macbook woth notably nbad windows drivers...
8. 428.▲
   by zobzu 11y ago

   I find it interesting that no one picks on the phone being as fast as the laptop. Its not exactly true either and the phones are fast but not that fast. Its a mix of safari perf, Network latency, memory, cpu/bus... And of course the bi
9. 429.▲
   by zobzu 11y ago

   you mean, like android?
10. 430.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    This is the internet, where retarded people redefine the words and their world view as they see fit. Most comments and up/down votes are about what people like/dislike not about what's either right, interesting or insightful.
11. 431.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    I thought thats why you can have like try/dev and master/prod branches (or repos)
12. 432.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    I dont wanna secure shit and i like clicks. Risk is about data. It doesn't matter if its security related or not. No data, no risk quantification. You do not have data - so you blog post is actually useless.
13. 433.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    So the next question is, anyone running Firefox on Wayland yet? ;)
14. 434.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    i dont think this part is needed at all, it just means the base image sux basically, so this is some patching up, which, well, is fine for demo purposes
15. 435.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    to be honest most of the work is done by iproute and unshare in this case. unshare basically calls clone() (syscall) with the correct namespace related paramters, iproute deals with veth.
16. 436.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    most of the problem is when tests depend on each other, which they oftentimes do or when they shouldnt but do, theres a large amount of work to change that
17. 437.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    also that they dont use a root daemon and random hard to debug, hard to verify things. it feels like most of them build large products around things to justify making money, while i like the simple, elegant, easy to verify little pieces of
18. 438.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    Since MIT-style licensed code gets close sourced I don't see how your logic works at all. Only few huge projects will share back, and generally only share back partially . If companies are going to choose closed-source license over op
19. 439.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    My name is zobzu. I fight for the users, and I'm standing up for the GPL. (seriously tho, same license by default, same reasons - feel free to downvote, it won't change my licensing choices)
20. 440.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    i think it usually boils down to "its tests, its not performance sensitive" then tests take 10x the build time and eventually impact productivity like crazy :(
21. 441.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    one issue i see is not the dupes but is that its decently easy to self-vote from several "accounts" and "ips" to be on the FP for a little while. the other one would be that due to the fast-paced news, only a few per day
22. 442.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    In use on common webpages edge feels very snappy. At least as much as firefox and chrome. Good enough for me.
23. 443.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    Love this sign, too bad I heard its gone
24. 444.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    the same really. I don't think anyone will know for sure. The poor guy might just have not caught the issues back then. Or maybe it was malicious and still is. It's hard to say. In these cases, the wisest option is "innocent
25. 445.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    just ask anyone that left mozilla recently. of course, since you sign nda's (yes, even at mozilla) i doubt many will come out publicly.
26. 446.▲
    Tiny LIDAR and mirror = 360 degre coverage. Time to make your own Google car?(forums.trossenrobotics.com)

    1 points by zobzu 11y ago|0 comments
27. 447.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    well, yes, you're right - its still there tho :|
28. 448.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    interestingly - firefox nightly for android has a "reading list" and no pocket which is .. basically pocket on top of firefox sync... also has a nicer integration and its pretty simple.. i dont even..
29. 449.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    yes, albeit i bet its negligible compared to the yahoo search deal
30. 450.▲
    by zobzu 11y ago

    removing it from view doesn't actually remove pocket - in fact you just have to click the hamburger menu and click pocket.. ooh its still here ;-)