zmmmmm

13 ms·

211.
by zmmmmm 6mo ago
Have had similar dramas with CSS. Opus/Sonnet seem to have far less taste and discipline in writing CSS - constantly they are trying to slam in changes with !important or inline styles rather than think through how to do it properly.
212.
by zmmmmm 6mo ago
seems like vscode + preview is nearly the same? I guess my key issue is, with files getting continuously modified by coding agents, I want really good integration with git and live update features. If the file just got edited, make it easy
213.
by zmmmmm 6mo ago
It's one of the things I really dislike about providers hyping "inference time scaling" as a concept. Apart from being a blatant misnomer (there's nothing scalable about it), it's so transparently a dial they can ma
214.
by zmmmmm 6mo ago
so if they are retroactive to 4.6 then they can't be trained into the model. They would have to be applied as a pre-screening or post-screening process. Which is disturbing since it implies already deployed workflows could be broken by
215.
by zmmmmm 6mo ago
Curious how the safeguards work and what impact they will have. In general I feel that over-engineering safeguards in training comes at a noticeable cost to general intelligence. Like asking someone to solve a problem on a white board in a
216.
by zmmmmm 6mo ago
It's like the rest of Agentic AI - a lot of talk, but when it comes to the crunch, very few people are actually willing to hand over full autonomy to anything where significant value / liability is in play. The truth is, a lot of
217.
by zmmmmm 6mo ago
Curious what happens in the context of a security flaw becoming known with a queue, especially with the whole dependency tree in play. Do we now wait for the fix to come through the queue? Or it gets an exception? Do packages that embed the
218.
by zmmmmm 6mo ago
Curious how / how well it deals with conflicts in the different branches that are part of the stack. Is there some support for managing that, or what happens when two of the branches don't rebase / merge cleanly?
219.
by zmmmmm 6mo ago
My own anecdotal experience is yes, there is a real visceral hatred of AI among Gen-Z. You have to look at it through a lens where they already feel like there's been a massive amount of intergenerational theft against them - particula
220.
by zmmmmm 6mo ago
Could be some logic to it - bad thinking is worse than no thinking and good thinking
221.
by zmmmmm 6mo ago
there's probably a high correlation between people with the "drive and hunger" to build a startup in the first place with those that would have the "drive and hunger" to relocate overseas to make it successful.
222.
by zmmmmm 6mo ago
Yet the UK did produce Deepmind. Which you can look at both ways since it got gobbled up by Google. But it at least came from the UK. I assume the article excludes the UK, I feel like UK has much more of a startup and VC scene than Europe d
223.
by zmmmmm 6mo ago
The glaring number to me is only 5% of VC funds vs 52% in the US. That's 10x more opportunity despite roughly comparable economies. As long as that is true, it seems like it will always be impossible to get an organic startup industr
224.
by zmmmmm 6mo ago
Can anybody validate this Github Copilot trick for accessign Opus 4.6? Sounds too good to be true.
225.
by zmmmmm 7mo ago
The real question for me, if we assume they once again have a competitive frontier model, is what this means for Meta's strategy now. In particular, have they abandoned all their philosophy of the open ecosystem / open model play
226.
by zmmmmm 7mo ago
So if I'm understanding right, Claude Code can use Claude Code now?
227.
by zmmmmm 7mo ago
They've frustrated the biggest military on the planet to the point of issuing expletives. It's a huge moral win. Symbolism matters more than anything else in these situations.
228.
by zmmmmm 7mo ago
Obviously it's entirely unprovable but it all aligns in very suspicious ways with a compelling narrative: Anthropic simply can't actually scale Claude Code to meet the opportunity right now. Every second enterprise on the planet i
229.
by zmmmmm 7mo ago
This is much needed. It says so much that "Title includes" is an advanced search .... I really wonder what a basic search is. My pet peeve: no way to filter on language. Once you hit obscure enough content, you start getting video
230.
by zmmmmm 7mo ago
It's a reasonable comment, and I should be clear, I don't expect it to be a platform. But I do expect to be able to use its advertised features for any reasonable purpose they can support. Where it leaves me is is sort of like the
231.
by zmmmmm 7mo ago
> building products around claude -p But OpenClaw is not a product. It's just a pile of open source code that the user happens to choose to run. It's the user electing to use the functionality provided to them in the manner the
232.
by zmmmmm 7mo ago
Interesting to see three entirely different responses to my question - but I think I believe this one the most. Not necessarily that they could be successful in attacking (who knows), but that trying would escalate things on the wrong timel
233.
by zmmmmm 7mo ago
Given it is reported to be successfully targeting Israel with cluster ammunitions in warheads, I am curious what stops Iran from targeting US ships even far outside the strait? I would have thought if you could send multiple missiles with c
234.
by zmmmmm 7mo ago
It's an interesting strategy, I see a pretty big risk from them leaning into it like this. We already have a vibe in my circles of the old "gmail vs yahoo" type thing where if you saw someone had a yahoo mail address you assu
235.
by zmmmmm 7mo ago
That's actually not too bad - it leaves space for devices that do have cameras or microphones for other reasons, as long as they don't persist the output. So you could do real time recognition for assistive devices etc.
236.
by zmmmmm 7mo ago
It's not just "having" them though, it's carrying them everywhere and constantly swapping over to your dumb glasses as you walk in and out of places that don't like the smart ones. Which is sort of my point: when ma
237.
by zmmmmm 7mo ago
I couldn't read the article but am curious what the definition of "smart" is. Because if that is the exact wording then it seems to be extremely broad and probably capture some unintended cases. These kind of blanket bans are
238.
by zmmmmm 7mo ago
> Then, ask if this bombing was part of group A or group B. false dichotomies are a common rhetorical method (and sometimes useful) to argue your way to a moral justification, but that doesn't make them reflect reality There is no A
239.
by zmmmmm 7mo ago
well you've zeroed on the part that I just don't accept at all here: > is liable to act adversarially ... > wishes to leverage itself to influence the government This goes way beyond the above requirement of "all legal
240.
by zmmmmm 7mo ago
So that should have been the end of it - why didn't the government just do that and leave it there? The gap between the accessible means for them to achieve the requirement they needed and the action they actually took amounts to a har

More ›