zmmmmm

8 ms·

121.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
> they would have started verifying the identity of their customers. Very good point. Yes i think this part goes to hubris. Amodei probably didn't think the ban would cut along those lines if it happened. And in fact it wouldn&#x27
122.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
I think it's a near universal phenomenon that people with extraordinary amounts of power become victims of their own hubris. Once you get sufficiently decoupled from the consequences of your own actions, it is near impossible to teth
123.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
it's pretty interesting in the sense that Amazon went far out of their way to build a secure process around this: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/bedrock/latest/userguide/data-pr... In theory, there currentl
124.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
Seems rather stingy - 6 months is barely longer than you will get on a free signup deal for a lot of online products anyway. Kind of worse than nothing if it causes you to adopt work patterns that aren't sustainable for the project aft
125.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
The only thing I can think of that would give Amazon reasons to dislike Mythos / Fable is that Anthropic really ruined their Bedrock story by imposing data retention requirements that cross a red line in regulatory compliance. It&#x27
126.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
works really well with pi for small to medium sized coding tasks for me - C++ is an interesting case since it's probably more challenging just due to the complexity of the syntax. But it works great with Groovy which is another slightl
127.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
And it is nearly always hubris - the people making these decisions are surrounded by yes-men who built their whole career pumping up the egos of their superiors.
128.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
DeepSeekv4 Pro is roughly Opus 4.5 - Opus 4.6 in my estimation. That's about 8 months difference, not 2.5 years. It's definitely not as good. But it's also definitely good enough .
129.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
it feels like it's mostly just tuned to up it's level of capability on long horizon tasks - stop context rot and keep persisting at all costs until a goal is done. The base intelligence does not feel much greater to me.
130.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
> the level of capability displayed there is widely available from other models Is this Dario leveraging it into a ban on open models?
131.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
Listen - that's the sound of millions of companies and users doubling down on Chinese models. It might be a national security problem for other nations to have access to these models. But it's equally now a national security probl
132.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
it looks handy but ... sbx policy set-default open just so the single pi sandbox can talk to localhost? ... this gives me some grave doubts about the rest of it being set up well.
133.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
So they are lying then when they say it's for safety reasons. I think if they want to behave anti competitively they should be honest about it and we should absolutely call them on it. Perhaps even regulators should.
134.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
> you trust them enough not to log your data prior to this, but not enough to trust their stated limits on how logged data will be used now It doesn't really matter how much you happen trust another party. In the regulatory world it
135.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
OpenAI ... your move. The enterprise market just cracked wide open. Do you want it?
136.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
The restrictions on using Fable to develop LLM technology seem nakedly anti-competitive. There doesn't appear to be any security rationalisation around that. I think we have to be careful how far we let company's get away with tha
137.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
check out DeepSeek V4 Pro .... this is where the threat vector comes from IMHO. If anything is triggering a rush to IPO imho it's seeing these cheap / free models on the horizon that are "good enough" for 80% of the core
138.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
it's an interesting question if any of the AI companies would be willing to step up and absorb the risk ie: to give the AI agent a "stake". eg: if my booking is wrong, they will cover the cost and compensate me. It would sor
139.
by zmmmmm 4mo ago
It's interesting how anemic the use cases seem to be - we see the same things recycled over and over: "reword my email", "remove object from picture", "add a reminder", "summarise my text message whi
140.
by zmmmmm 5mo ago
I tend to agree with your overall point, but I think you reveal far more about yourself than you accurately reflect anything about HN. Just read back what you wrote: > AI-assisted version could have been deployed 10x faster. By then, eno
141.
by zmmmmm 5mo ago
They could be lying with all this: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/bedrock/latest/userguide/data-pr... But it seems tremendously unlikely with how explicit they are being with it. It is clearly one of the top sel
142.
by zmmmmm 5mo ago
Curious how much this is AI related vs just generic stupidity? ie: did they put guard rails in place but the AI bot creatively found out a way around them? or is it literally just, they mindlessly empowered it to do these things without eve
143.
by zmmmmm 5mo ago
I don't think it's as silly as people are making out. It at least proves a passenger is in control of the device, rather than it being stashed / hidden in the cabin. A device in the cabin not owned by any passenger broadcasti
144.
by zmmmmm 5mo ago
Yeah ... my org immediately stopped provisioning space for new employees once we had remote and could desk-share, so when RTO idea came up, the first thing that stopped it was we physically have only about 50% of the desks we need now. It&#
145.
by zmmmmm 5mo ago
effectively, that means it's a VM not a container because sharing the kernel ultimately means all the devices come along for the ride which give all kinds of fancy ways to communicate with the outside world - network is just the start
146.
by zmmmmm 5mo ago
> I'm flabbergasted that Anthropic and OpenAI aren't more worried about these attack vectors. It feels like amateur hour I share your concern but it's not a correct characterisation to say they are not taking it seriously:
147.
by zmmmmm 5mo ago
No vision support?
148.
by zmmmmm 5mo ago
It would be interesting to explore if the results hold up on long range tasks - this study looks like it was based on one-shot answers. With people also you can see short term improved performance from rude interactions, but it will cause o
149.
by zmmmmm 5mo ago
I don't know why it says "tech CEOs", the article is almost entirely focused on non-tech / generic CEOs.
150.
by zmmmmm 5mo ago
Yes, I would say this keyboard is notable specifically because it is one of the few travel keyboards that is truly at par with a real desktop keyboard. It's not perfect, but the benefits of "one keyboard everywhere" outweigh

More ›