ziofill

22 ms·

421.
by ziofill 2y ago
In my minimal blog I use this, it seems to be working pretty well on a wide range of devices: /* styles.css */ html { max-width: 70ch; padding: 3em 1em; margin: auto; line-height: 1.75; fon
422.
Next Future Mobility(next-future-mobility.com)
1 points by ziofill 2y ago|0 comments
423.
by ziofill 2y ago
I agree. Also, I’ve heard LeCun arguing that a super intelligent AI wouldn’t be so “dumb” as to decide to do something terrible for humanity. So it will be 100% resistant to adversarial attacks? And malicious actors won’t ever train their o
424.
by ziofill 2y ago
Reminds me of Donald Hoffman’s perspective on consciousness
425.
by ziofill 2y ago
And I guess disconnecting the microphones will void the warranty?
426.
by ziofill 2y ago
All the better if you are the one holding the patent ^^ (just kidding)
427.
by ziofill 2y ago
Are coding LLMs trained with the help of interpreters?
428.
by ziofill 2y ago
I always found the argument that shooters played violent video games extremely weak. Of course they play video games, like most people their age.
429.
by ziofill 2y ago
I’ve been using and recommending Signal for years now. Recently I have learned that Signal relies on AWS. What are the implications from a security perspective?
430.
by ziofill 2y ago
> Virtually all authors define the dual of A […] and there seems to be no consensus as to which one is best. It doesn’t matter because every single one of these definitions is crap. Love it :)
431.
by ziofill 2y ago
How accurate does the timing need to be? I imagine there must be many Bobs getting notifications around the same time. Also, if I use Signal behind a VPN is it still known that I’m talking to the Signal servers?
432.
by ziofill 2y ago
> One of the biggest privacy problems in messaging is the availability of loads of meta-data — essentially data about who uses the service, who they talk to, and when they do that talking. […] the same problem exists with virtually every
433.
by ziofill 2y ago
Give Warp a spin https://www.warp.dev/
434.
by ziofill 2y ago
Hehe I wish. You are forgetting that you can locally decide the measurement setting. For a setting the bits are (anti)correlated, for another one they are uncorrelated. If they always had a value, not only it wouldn’t work: even assigning a
435.
by ziofill 2y ago
https://xkcd.com/1168/
436.
by ziofill 2y ago
For me things got much better when I got to uni. In high school I didn’t care about most of the subjects, but at uni I was studying what I had chosen for myself.
437.
by ziofill 2y ago
That's only half of the argument though. The other half is how does entanglement correctly coordinate the probabilistic outcomes, when there's no causal order? (meaning, you can't assume there's a sort of signal that tra
438.
by ziofill 2y ago
I’m not sure I understand: is it doing the processing? Or is it more like a Bluetooth microphone?
439.
by ziofill 2y ago
Yes you're on the right track: there isn't any 'action' between the two systems, it's a correlation. However, here's the thing that fries my brain: for classical systems correlation means the pre-existing value
440.
by ziofill 2y ago
When snapping a photo, couldn't a phone produce a hash with date/time/location included? I understand it's not bullet-proof, but at least it would make it possible to verify the original to some degree.
441.
by ziofill 2y ago
I am a theoretical physicist, and I am very much in tune with the author. Take quantum mechanics (my field), it is clear that even though we have a working model of it, it doesn't explain how nature instantiates it. Entanglement is a
442.
by ziofill 2y ago
shameless
443.
by ziofill 2y ago
A few years ago I left a tenured position and transitioned to industry. It was quite a mixed bag of feelings, including grief for a career that I had identified myself with. It’s very difficult not to identify ourselves with our jobs.
444.
by ziofill 2y ago
I have an endless streak of unfinished projects, at various stages of completion. All the ones that I finished had something in common: they served a purpose I cared about. If you don’t really care about what a project can do for you it’s
445.
by ziofill 2y ago
I think I’m not understanding what goes into making this available. Fine-tuning is a known technique, why is it available “only” now?
446.
by ziofill 2y ago
So… it’s training itself on synthetic data?
447.
by ziofill 2y ago
+1 for the Thor labs candy box
448.
by ziofill 2y ago
This is probably the best part: “And if you're ever feeling down, note that this still works even if that "someone" is you”
449.
by ziofill 2y ago
Are these removals handled by a human or automated?
450.
by ziofill 2y ago
Not Dexter’s laboratory! That’s the reason why I’m a scientist! :(

More ›