Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zilti
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
211.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
Syncthing maybe?
212.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
I simply settled for Texinfo. It has great features exactly for tech documentation.
213.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
Show me one, just one. I used to have two different Swiss carriers where SMS were free, and now I have the German WINsim, a cheap carrier, where I pay 10€/month and get 15gb, flat phone calls and flat sms. I haven't paid for sms i
214.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
No. PWAs are not a thing on desktops, they still need the entire browser, and they are still just a browser page. That's a far cry from what JavaFX enabled.
215.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
I was really hoping for the Astro Slide. Then the fxtex. Both turned out to essentially be a scam. All other "pure Linux" phones out there have hardware that is so laughably bad that I almost take it as a personal insult.
216.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
Is there really any carrier that still charges for SMS?
217.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
I wish we'd get what JavaFX promised: Programs running in the browser that can be installed by simply dragging them out of the browser.
218.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
There is WASIX as a "POSIX for WASM"
219.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
The thing is that this - unlike ClojureJVM, ClojureScript, ClojureCLR - only acts as if it were Clojure, while not actually being it, by lacking some core features and having a out of technical necessity convoluted "pod" mechanism
220.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
Amused is the word you're looking for.
221.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
My question with Babashka is always: why? Why force Clojure into something it is not? Why force some interpreter through the heavy GraalVM machinery to have a binary interpreter for a language that wasn't meant for this? Just because &
222.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
No, they have not been installed on your device - all you got is simple branded GUIs on top of the Safari engine.
223.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
That xkcd gets me every time.
224.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
If it's any consolation, it's been around since the 90s
225.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
LOL whoever wrote that CoC has a worse case of snowflakism than the local college reading club and a Trump rally combined, yet has the audacity to tell others to go see a therapist? That's bold.
226.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
I don't think it being too broad was the reason. "Asian" is just as broad, and the silly "PoC" is even worse.
227.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
People still don't consider "indian" unusual, and the "native Americans" insist on being called Indians officially
228.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
and it's even worse with TEDx
229.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
To be fair, that is exactly what's the case with most homeless. Their mental health is in too much of a bad state that they could take care of renting a flat etc. You can't just solve the problem by sticking them into flats; that
230.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
It does not. That is not how language works.
231.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
It's really not hard to give Clojure that... I'm a full-time Clojure dev, but also use Scheme a lot, and while some Clojure features are great (mainly the STM), in a lot of cases the terribleness of certain language features and i
232.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
Because some people throw a tantrum if it doesn't come pre-dockerized, I suppose
233.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
I'm getting at least 8 hours out of my AMD framework.
234.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
Another huge area of frustration is the almost complete lack of documentation. Reading pages of undocumented code to guess what functionality is there, and for which inputs it even works, is a frustrating endeavour.
235.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
is CE the same as AD?
236.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
Final wakeup call for the other parties.
237.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
No, it suggests that the company was afraid it'd negatively affect their image if they'd fly anyway.
238.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
In terms of server install ISOs, I can highly recommend mfsBSD, and also cloud-init to trigger post-install setup
239.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
Open an incognito tab and read what it says.
240.
▲
by
zilti
3y ago
No. Your second sentence is not in the slightest implied by your first. Try again.
More ›