ziddoap

31 ms·

631.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Ah, that explains it. They can test them on animals. Thanks!
632.
by ziddoap 2y ago
What? Can you explain where you think I set goalposts, and how you think I moved them? Because I am not following.
633.
by ziddoap 2y ago
They are advertising on their website, extremely prominently, that they are fit for your all of identity management needs. Are they allowed to put a single paragraph in their license file that runs counter to all of their other marketing, a
634.
by ziddoap 2y ago
This is not a one-person project ran by someone in their spare time, posted online for fun. They are going out of their way to advertise so that people use their security-critical software in security-critical applications, and then they ne
635.
by ziddoap 2y ago
I'm not sure what point you are trying to make but thankfully, given that they obviously can't be trusted to maintain security-critical software (despite what they imply on their website and marketing material), I haven't dow
636.
by ziddoap 2y ago
I'm not asking for more. I'm saying I think it is scummy to do the bare minimum when you're advertising yourself as a critical piece of security software and encouraging the use of the software in real security-critical appli
637.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> You really feel that anything that is not directly on the home page does not matter? No, that's not what I said. When it comes to software like this (one of the most important components of your security architecture), hiding the
638.
by ziddoap 2y ago
3 replies to a single comment, and you're doing this all over this thread. You're almost 10% of the comments here, and there's a lot of comments. Might be good to take a step back for a few minutes/hours.
639.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Point 7 buried in the license document of the github repository is very much not https://www.keycloak.org/
640.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> I have 0 obligations to do or fix anything I've made open source. While technically true, this seems pretty scummy when you're advertising security software for real people and companies to use as their identity management.
641.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Funny, for sure, but does not explain what they will be doing in reality.
642.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Sure, I mean I read both the wikipedia pages so I've understood that. And I'm not trying to be obtuse here, honestly, but that still doesn't really help me understand why "cold welding, despite the name, _is not welding
643.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> Cold welding is unintentional, spontaneous joining of two metal parts in vacuum. Is the only distinction the intention, though? Because I saw some examples of industrial applications of cold welding, so I'm still not quite gettin
644.
by ziddoap 2y ago
I know nothing about welding, what is the distinction? I clicked on that Wiki link and it said cold welding is "welding process" , and the hyperlink to the regular welding page includes solid-state welding, which mentions cold we
645.
by ziddoap 2y ago
That is them stating their opinion. That is not them "undermining the free flow of information". > Discussion about any of the above points happen in a "free" environment in which all parties can express their views.
646.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> tries to undermine the free flow and dissemination of information Maybe I'm out of the loop here, where did the Guardian try to undermine the free flow of information? They even went out of their way to clarify that: > "X
647.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Did I miss the evidence that this is state-backed?
648.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> I wish we could find some solution where we distribute the epileptic-safe versions alongside the unsafe ones and users could choose. They seem to be able to distribute uncensored & censored versions for some of the more risque or
649.
by ziddoap 2y ago
The original post says nothing about "the people behind the curtains whose names are in no legal papers are in fact still the same people with close ties to putin and his inner circle." , which is the sentence that comes directly
650.
by ziddoap 2y ago
For those who don't get the reference, there was an incident where security research by University of Minnesota students/professors was conducted without communicating or receiving permission from anyone on the Linux side or from
651.
by ziddoap 2y ago
1,200 words of legalese, boiling down to "you can't hold us liable for anything we say here" is not "being honest".
652.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> … search? Search alone doesn't seem to be very profitable. Look at how many different products Kagi is rolling out just to capture more paying users. DDG would have to be create an even better search than Kagi. I don't think
653.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Their main point has always been to be a condom between people and companies like Google, Microsoft, etc. Not just payment information, but other tracking and data as well. I think that's a fine niche for them to be in. What products w
654.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> Even back then people were trying to make money out of YouTube It's a matter of degree. Early YouTube was much closer to what the parent poster describes than the YouTube of today. When I first discovered YouTube and uploaded vid
655.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> was famously blasted by Linus for not having industry experience. I answered my own question (where to read more about this), and found the relevant information from https://www.oreilly.com/openbook/opensources&#x
656.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> BFU state. "Before first unlock", for those like me who weren't familiar with this particular acronym.
657.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> which is actually faster than the 20:44 TAS! I had no idea what this was. For people like me, after clicking through the link and some googling: TAS = "Tool-assisted speedrun" or "tool-assisted superplay", and they
658.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> What do I do with this "Error Code: 600010"? Cloudfare, the gatekeeper of the internet, strikes again. The usual suspects are VPN or proxy, javascript, cookies, etc. https://developers.cloudflare.com/turnstil
659.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> Quality ratings based on internal testing and user feedback I'd be interested in knowing more about the methodology here. People who use Kagi tend to love Kagi, so bias would certainly get in the way if not controlled for. How
660.
by ziddoap 2y ago
This is a fun little post about reversing a dreamcast game. No one is being a zealot.

More ›