ziddoap

34 ms·

541.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> If you're pulling in a package that has 400 dependencies, how the heck would you even competently check 10% of that surface area? This would be where different security advice would apply: don't pull in a package that has 40
542.
by ziddoap 2y ago
People just remember the shitty decisions more vividly and for longer than people remember the dozens of good decisions made in between. Most good decisions don't get a full press cycle (because they are boring).
543.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> verifiably true Who/how was it verified?
544.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> If you have an assigned CSAM That's an unfortunate acronym. I assume you mean Customer Service Account Manager.
545.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Pac-Man literally teaches you to eat unknown white pills. It's actually amazing that people are able to play it without becoming drug addicts.
546.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> based on their input was a big part of getting their tattoos. For me, as someone with ~70% of my body covered, I would have no problem using AI-generated images as part of that input . I'm not just going to get whatever the mode
547.
by ziddoap 2y ago
For sure, cost is maybe the most common reason. But I have friends who game on cards that can run SD no problem (prior to a recent upgrade, I had SD running on a 2060S with no problem, which is like $250?), they just don't want to for
548.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> all I care about is that the artist is "good" and has a style I like. Same! > Beyond that I don't need AI slop I don't share the same hatred of AI. If something is cool looking, it's cool. I bring it to my
549.
by ziddoap 2y ago
I think your definition of laypeople and my definition of laypeople are different. If I talked to anyone not in my IT department about fine-tuning, their eyes would glaze over in 2 seconds. These types of services are, in my opinion, target
550.
by ziddoap 2y ago
I mean, you should always be looking at what your tattoo artist can do before you get a tattoo. Don't print off a color cartoon picture from here and go to your local black-and-white realism artist.
551.
by ziddoap 2y ago
As someone with most of my body covered, two things I would say: 1) Sometimes I just don't really know what I want. I have an area X big and most of my body is in the style of Y. AI lets me iterate hundreds of design ideas quickly. My
552.
by ziddoap 2y ago
I think it can make sense when you have some secret-sauce mixed in for whatever the application is. A custom fine-tuned model, text embedding, LoRAs, etc. It's certainly less convincing to me when someone offers just a plain wrapper
553.
by ziddoap 2y ago
One-time payment is nice! The other AI Tattoo services I've seen all offer monthly subscriptions which just doesn't make sense. Price is in the ballpark, but a bit steep for me when I can run models on my own hardware. However, fo
554.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Do a lot of people use HN clients? It never occurred to me to look for one. Looking at the feature list here, most of them I can already do (comment, vote, submit, etc.). Some of the other features I feel like would degrade my experience (p
555.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Weirdly, it works for me on FireFox (I see the Google-like page) but not on Edge (where I just see a link for Google, no mimicry). I am not signed in on Edge.
556.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Non-American here (i.e. did not watch the debate), what trouble became evident? Were they fact-checking too much? Not enough? Incorrectly?
557.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Not parent, but yes. A switch that must be turned on (opt-in), rather than a switch that must be turned off (opt-out).
558.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> ITP Interventions Testing Program (by The National Institute on Aging) for the unfamiliar, like me.
559.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> Well, what is a company supposed to do if local candidates do not want RTO? Well one option, of course, would be not forcing staff to return to office.
560.
by ziddoap 2y ago
What does this have to do with what I said? Name calling is not a way to make a convincing point. That's the entirety of my comment.
561.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Can you explain this image and how it relates to my comment like I'm 5?
562.
by ziddoap 2y ago
While it might be fair, I'm saying that using childish nicknames does no favors if you're trying to make people agree with what your saying. I don't think following Trump's footsteps with tit-for-tat name calling is bene
563.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Silly name calling isn't how grownups should discuss politics. If anything, it makes it harder to agree with any point you're trying to make. Edit: I had no idea it was controversial to say that name calling makes an argument less
564.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> Seriously, paywalling of scientific research is obviously wrong. Agreed! Here you go: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10234
565.
by ziddoap 2y ago
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/12/18/2024-29... The tweet is a super brief summary, reproduced below. Founders can self petition (& spouses can work) - Own >50% of the entity,
566.
by ziddoap 2y ago
It would be a lot less abrasive to say "It's linked elsewhere, but here it is: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10234 " or some variation, instead of saying "it's here somewhere, go find it".
567.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> I don't understand what is meant by phishing-resistant By far the most common phish is "click this link or your account will be shut down" which brings you to a fake Microsoft/Google sign-in page, where they say &q
568.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> Are we not at a point where it would be vastly more appropriate to title this "one person dev team"? Sure! I just find it interesting that these discussions only happen when "woman" is in the title, and never when
569.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> discussions That is a charitable way to read the flagged comments.
570.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> I don't really find any of the specific comments notable, hateful, or oppositional. The fact that gender is mentioned at all, when it's never mentioned in posts that have "one man dev team" in the title, doesn&#x27

More ›