Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zeven7
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
48 ms
·
541.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
https://bitcoinfees.21.co/ currently recommends around $0.17 per transaction.
542.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
The civil war in Titor's time line started in 2004, well before the first iPhone. I'd imagine the war altered his timeline enough that modern smart phones with nice cameras were not invented.
543.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
In a startup now. Worked at a 800 person tech company 4 years ago. All laptops, all wireless (at least on my team -- I'm sure there were people that were plugged in somewhere). Worked at a much larger tech company 1 year ago. Had a des
544.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
What makes Apple's better? Genuine question; I haven't looked into this at all.
545.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
> Wireless audio is like wireless internet, in > that it's better than nothing but worse than > something with wires and a stable connexion. From my perspective, wired internet has effectively gone away. I haven&
546.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
What about a special set of bytes that are standardized that all IOT machines should send in every request. Some sort of IS_IOT signature. That way if there's a huge influx, all messages containing the signature could be filtered.
547.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
I haven't read it myself, but I heard that's what Laszlo Bock said in Work Rules.
548.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
I interviewed at Google in March 2014 and was given an offer. I wasn't interviewing for a specific team. After the in-person interviews my recruiter set me up with 2 different team managers to talk to about potentially joining their
549.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
I'm not sure about OP, but there is a tech company that has said it hires people who fail their interviews occasionally to see if their interview process is working. That company is the one that is the subject of this thread.
550.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
> In a list, find all the number pairs that add up to another number in the list. You're saying this is a bad question because it's too complicated? Am I missing something? It really doesn't seem more complicated than the
551.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
The laser is only on each device for 10 minutes. And there are 1,000 of them. So the hope is that at laest 1 in 1,000 will make it.
552.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
Tip: You can stick to `const` when declaring `i` in the loop header (at least as far as the ES spec is concerned -- mileage may vary on current implementations / transpilers).
553.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
Indeed, the DAO was GPL v3[1]. It was taken to the tune of $50M. Slapping a particular license on it doesn't make it more secure. [1] https://github.com/slockit/DAO/blob/develop/LICENSE
554.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
> Nobody in their right mind will trust eth again, especially with the actions of the people behind it. Let me offer some data points: https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4vlk4j/consensys_... P
555.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
Nothing happened for them... Mist is a client that lets you see your balances and send ether or other tokens from one account to another. If you don't open Mist, you don't send any coins on one chain or the other, and nothing happ
556.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
Just to fill in a couple gaps: The attack lasted approximately 3 hours, starting by draining the largest accounts and moving down from there over time. It's known not all of them were stolen. I've seen estimates (by outsiders) tha
557.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
> fancy notation always gets in the way of understanding because people naturally think in words, not in spatial relationships. I'm pretty sure this is false for me. I think thinking in spacial relationships comes much more naturall
558.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
In order to start litigation, they would have to reveal their identity. Among other things, this could bring them their own legal troubles. I am surprised the attacker didn't try to bribe the miners, though.
559.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
No vote means they don't care enough to say either way. Why would anyone who feels strongly against the fork say "I will now let everyone know how much I'm against the fork by not voting"? That's not how it works. F
560.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
It is very common to suggest to people new to the game of go to lose the first 100 games as quickly as possible [1]. Not "play", "lose". The fact is you will lose a vast majority of the first 100 games you play because t
561.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
I don't understand this comment. "predict" "March 15, 2016". It's already 4 months past that date.
562.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
Same.
563.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
"As an older friend, I must advise you against it, for, in the first place you will not succeed, and even if you succeed, no one will believe you" (Max Planck to Einstein on his pursuit to develop a new theory of gravity).
564.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
Google has code in C++, Java, Python, Go, and JavaScript spanning countless different products (Google has a lot of products), all in the same repo.
565.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
They also know the curator of the Dark DAO that performed the initial attack [1]. This could allow recovering nearly 100% of the funds with only a soft fork. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4p7m
566.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
Link?
567.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
But wasn't your argument that "Ethereum ... suffers from the unsolvable halting problem" and that "there is no way to prove that a given Ethereum program does not have a bug that will cause it to halt at some point in th
568.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
Yeah, a lot more feasible but not less suicidal. The idea is that if miners were to band together to abuse their power and rig the system, the larger population would lose faith in Bitcoin's ability to accurately serve as an accounting
569.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
All Ethereum contracts halt. Performing operations requires spending ether (which is paid to miners) and there's a maximum amount of ether which can be spent per transaction. The more operations your contract performs, the more you hav
570.
▲
by
zeven7
10y ago
> Who said an attack would happen by allocating computing resources? > Suppose that the majority of miners Doesn't the "majority of miners" being in on it mean the same thing as "allocating computing resources"
More ›