Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zethraeus
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
91.
▲
by
zethraeus
9y ago
Your/the writing tone seems like it'll make for a fun game :)
92.
▲
by
zethraeus
9y ago
Uber employee here: Give some thought to what you'd expect to see over time if the company genuinely had changed internally. Hold Uber to it. I suspect it'll meet that bar.
93.
▲
by
zethraeus
9y ago
Welcome to the dark web. It's terrible here.
94.
▲
by
zethraeus
9y ago
As someone who often has anxiety: that anxiety is often irrational. Extrapolating fears rooted in one environment to another in which there is no danger is: 1) very human 2) irrational.
95.
▲
by
zethraeus
9y ago
This already happens. The bots aren't inline as chat messages, but they're contextually aware ads like 'get an uber!'
96.
▲
by
zethraeus
9y ago
Regulators must be held accountable for the impact of the incentives they create. Setting those up correctly is their damn job.
97.
▲
by
zethraeus
9y ago
A conversation with the author of this piece.
98.
▲
by
zethraeus
9y ago
Sexual selection seems like a really interesting case of natural selection having the property of both creating and filling an evolutionary niche. Through that lens, there's no counterintuitive behavior here, and natural selection isn&
99.
▲
by
zethraeus
10y ago
I work at Uber, and the part of it I interact with is a company with smart, driven, collaborative people doing a valuable thing together.
100.
▲
by
zethraeus
10y ago
I strongly second this. I got into the habit of consuming lots of caffeine and assuming my anxious state was baseline. Aggressively cutting out coffee was a really interesting and useful experience.
101.
▲
by
zethraeus
10y ago
fuck your anger. :)
102.
▲
by
zethraeus
10y ago
This article is really good.
103.
▲
by
zethraeus
10y ago
They certainly did not say that there was 'gross negligence'. That would have meant a case.
104.
▲
by
zethraeus
10y ago
I'm impressed. This is possibly the only article I've seen about 4chan whose author actually understands enough about the discussed subcultures to make interesting analyses.
105.
▲
by
zethraeus
10y ago
To quell your suspicion you could download the driver app and take a look at the surge map. The surge values aren't a secret.
106.
▲
by
zethraeus
11y ago
you're both taking a miserable but ambiguous situation and trying to make it black and white. that's not really useful.
107.
▲
by
zethraeus
11y ago
The language itself is lovely. What parts of cocoa feel essential to you?
108.
▲
by
zethraeus
11y ago
that seems arbitrary and at odds with the modern considerations of superior orders
109.
▲
by
zethraeus
11y ago
here's a port i cobbled together from some firefox addon demos in 15 minutes. tested to work on wsj https://github.com/zethraeus/wgsm-ff/blob/master/gglsntm.xpi... (consider reading the source inste
110.
▲
by
zethraeus
12y ago
No, you as an individual don't 'need' to do that. What does 'need' even mean? Require to survive? Making societally optimal decisions is a crazy burden to try to put on a single person. As single entities we don
111.
▲
by
zethraeus
12y ago
the article follows one of the funded parties
112.
▲
by
zethraeus
12y ago
yes
113.
▲
by
zethraeus
12y ago
> Exploring how chemicals affect your brain is fun if becoming a different person is fun. So don't do it unless you're sure you dislike yourself. This sentence isn't really logically sound. There are lots of reasons to mak
114.
▲
by
zethraeus
12y ago
You're right, it was intended to be read humorously. The argument I alluded to is that there is an internally consistent viewpoint in which the government action at hand is genuinely corrupt and supporting crony capitalism. In this wor
115.
▲
by
zethraeus
12y ago
Huh. I don't think I've ever before offended someone else on the internet enough to make them find and wave the shared last name in my face.
116.
▲
by
zethraeus
12y ago
The comment is just derision by someone who respects the authority of conventional power and is unsympathetic to someone having a fundamentally different but consistent stance. ;)
117.
▲
by
zethraeus
12y ago
this feels like satire.
118.
▲
by
zethraeus
12y ago
git diff?
119.
▲
by
zethraeus
12y ago
I didn't read it as being directed only as targets. There's been a general push, among communities suffering harassment, against the notion that vocally calling out malicious actors is 'feeding the trolls' in the traditi
120.
▲
by
zethraeus
12y ago
Not identifying as a feminist or not being a feminist? You can identify however you want, but if you're truly not sexist, you're a feminist as far as I can tell.
More ›