Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zer8k
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
44 ms
·
391.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
Goes with almost anything, has a relaxed feel to it, light, and breezy. Couldn't ask for more out of a shirt to be honest.
392.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
Hasn't been my experience. With managed systems on azure life is fairly easy from a sysop perspective. Getting ransomware is more of a strategic problem than an operating system problem at that scale. Personally, I prefer Linux servers
393.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
Pretty hot take considering Windows Server is still incredibly popular especially in stuffy fortune 500s. It's also an acceptable OS for people who are less technical, or have a specific requirement to be on Windows. I would argue mech
394.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
I can second that. I was an pretty good programmer as a kid. I'd go home and write whatever I could imagine on the old 286 box my parents had. I spent time in "gifted" programs at school, etc. However, I hated math. HATED it.
395.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
> If I decide not to pay, it's on you to bear the cost. I don't have any obligation to you. That is not how the actual world functions. This sort of anarcho-primitivism does not lead itself to large scale, widely available, sys
396.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
To be fair, there is a dramatic difference between the free you are talking about and the free that youtube, facebook, etc are. It's one thing to offer a small website or something for free. It's another thing to power a million,
397.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
I work in the ad industry. I have some expertise both on witnessing the alleged decline and counter-acting it. Before anyone asks about my moral compass I do not like ads, I never have, but they're an inevitability. The problems big ad
398.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
Sure bud. What is it about HN'ers talking with such confidence they legitimately have no idea what they're even talking about? I googled it for you, and gave you two sources are probably amicable towards - there are THOUSANDS more
399.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
The US's healthcare system is so bleak because we quite literally fund healthcare for the rest of the planet. Taxpayers in the US get access to the best treatment decades earlier if they're rich enough. Prices are increased on US
400.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
That's not even close to the same thing. Stack overflow posters don't hallucinate solutions, and in all but the most obscure questions, the selected answer will have been reviewed dozens of times over. With ChatGPT you get exactly
401.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
Also know your boss. I know I cannot suggest such a thing to my boss. Generally, the more "serious" your company is with an established stack the less likely you're going to get a green light to do anything not blessed by man
402.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
The issue to me is not the generation of code. It's that the person using it is inexperienced with the given language. We will never be able to place 100% faith in AI. At least in my lifetime. Given that, I think it's a relative d
403.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
Professionally I do Python. From my experience the breakages occur due to an over-reliance on libraries to do trivial tasks. Do you find a different case?
404.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
This is one of the few places I would actually prefer the GPL. If someone contributes to this repository with it's current license a company can simply get the weights for free and sell them. You've just made it easier to create a
405.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
I have grown somewhat tired of these ChatGPT responses. It's a tool...not a panacea. C is a fantastic, albeit somewhat complicated, language. The problem is a C programmer knows the quirks and ChatGPT will dump you some code that could
406.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
I can understand what you are saying but I can actually draw a straight line from cause to effect here. The relationship was swell prior to that and started falling apart after. It may be hard to believe if you are a person who is over-conn
407.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
I'd say you're probably right. Except it went from having things in common to what it is now. I can identify the exact bifurcation point and it is when "lifestyle" social media became popular. At that point I feel like t
408.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
I wouldn't call myself a bottom tier dev. I've done plenty of Go programming in a corporate-ish environment. It's restrictive, which is nice, because the ceiling for expert is basically on the floor. It's the Ruby on Rai
409.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
I got downvoted because I guess "experiment" was too loose of a term. Indeed, I mean being able to modify the system to suit you. Go, instead, is a system that molds you in it's image. Which is why I believe it's the nex
410.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
> Smartphones have caused more upheaval than anything I’ve seen in my career. I don't know if I believe this _totally_. However, I can attest to the fact my relationship has more-or-less been permanently damaged by social media. I a
411.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
A follow up analogy is more typical in my experience. The foreman says that we should reinforce the walls. The PMP certified 6 sigma ninja Project Manager insists that the reinforced walls aren't necessary because no one is going to pu
412.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
I think my problem really comes down to the fact experimentation with Go is fundamentally impossible. It's like trying to experiment with another highly opinionated framework. It's usefulness for producing something that works wel
413.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
I don't mean this in a sarcastic way but Go was explicitly designed for the lowest common denominator developer. Kernighan said it himself. That's the problem with Go in general I think. Much like my experience with Ruby on Rails
414.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
I have this opinion and these days I get mocked for it. I don't have any words to describe it myself very well. The best way I think to is that the world seemed far less atomized. "The internet" was a place where it didnt mat
415.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
> The lab-leak conspiracy gang has smeared scientists and misled the public into believing a theory that has no factual support whatsoever. They should be ashamed. Cleverly disguised opinion article. The USG debunked nothing. The officia
416.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
You have strange definitions of "just fine". > Instead of 4 kids you might have 2 Ok. > Your spouse might have to work part time or full time This isn't "just fine". There is significant overlap in child succe
417.
▲
by
zer8k
3y ago
Youre either not well informed or being deliberately obtuse. Cell phone data has been used in individual cases for almost as long as cell phones existed. J6 was one of the first cases where mass surveillance paired with ad tracking and towe