zer00eyz

8 ms·

121.
by zer00eyz 4mo ago
> can only handle a single concurrent request, and has no internal queuing And the systems that load balancers front almost never behave this way... Dont even get me started on client performance here as well, latency, speed, caching --
122.
by zer00eyz 4mo ago
Not even remotely close to the same... https://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2008/04/23/le-twittre
123.
by zer00eyz 4mo ago
> There is a crazy amount of land in the world, but either it's too expensive or you're not allowed to build over it, or a combination of both. This is true, to a degree. There is another factor and thats WHAT kind of housing w
124.
by zer00eyz 4mo ago
> security by obscurity thing... What am I missing here? You are looking at the problem from the wrong direction. If you build a honeypot, to trap hackers, does it behove you to explain what the bait is, and how the trap works? Know your
125.
by zer00eyz 4mo ago
> For non-techies like me, Fediverse accounts and mastodon.social are non-starters. For technical people these things should be non starters as well. It is a group of people who should be acutely aware of everything wrong with social med
126.
by zer00eyz 4mo ago
Git is fit for purpose. That purpose is to host a monorepo, with out a lot of 3rd party dependancies, distributed, patch based. Thats not how everyone else works. We're all using package managers to help with massive amounts of 3rd par
127.
by zer00eyz 4mo ago
> the off ramp is clearly happening for ethernet You should be running both. If you are being smart about it your planning distributed switching (fiber to media boxes with power). From a pure networking stance, fiber is the way to go. Bu
128.
by zer00eyz 4mo ago
https://www.whatisepigenetics.com/scarred-for-life-the-epige... https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6414251/ I don't think we are biologically far enough removed from "Oh my god, ru
129.
by zer00eyz 4mo ago
You're slightly off the mark here. They are NOT "em-proof" --- what they are is electronic warfare immune. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2529849-fully-autonomou... Published this year, but talking
130.
by zer00eyz 4mo ago
> At least Anthropic weren't lying when they said only a week ago or so "No one has figured out guardrails yet" Anthropics guardrails are the TSA saying "take off your shoes" while failing every test. https:&#x2
131.
by zer00eyz 4mo ago
> link between Ticketmaster and the scalper Except this was going on back in the 90's. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-05-27-ca-579-st... Then it was an informal, local, criminal enterprise. Local
132.
by zer00eyz 5mo ago
> No one cares about security. Not true, the C suite cares a LOT about security. You need that human shield, that person to blame when it does go wrong...
133.
by zer00eyz 5mo ago
> What are people doing with prototypes afterward? I think what people ARENT doing is interesting. Usability isn't even in your list, it is not something most people even think of. The best thing you can do with a prototype is give
134.
by zer00eyz 5mo ago
God damn this nail gun is making me lazy, its like I don't have to swing the hammer any more... Most people, given a nail gun, cant build a house, thats where the skill is... Im not someone whose validation came from the lines of code,
135.
by zer00eyz 6mo ago
> The cost of AI isn't. This is why there are a ton of corps running the open source models in house... Known costs, known performance, upgrade as you see fit. The consumer backlash against 4o was noted by a few orgs, and they saw t
136.
by zer00eyz 6mo ago
Someone once described agile as this: Its just pantomime and posit notes... implying that the process (from the outside) was more performative than anything else. From "scrum masters" to "planing poker" it's all ver
137.
by zer00eyz 6mo ago
2024: Industry group invalidates 2,600 official Intel CPU benchmarks — SPEC says the company's compiler used unfair optimizations to boost performance https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/spec-inval
138.
by zer00eyz 6mo ago
> I see people choose Kafka and SQS SQS is dead simple, and if your in AWS (forever) it is "in the stack" with some easy to use features that may make sense to you (delay queue is a great one). Kafka is... a lot. If you need wh
139.
by zer00eyz 6mo ago
Crowdstrike, no pe because it just had its first profitable quarter (38 million) ZScalar No PE Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW) 86 PE Fortinet : (FTNT) 31.63 PE That last one, didn't get hit at all by the Mythos announcement, because at s
140.
by zer00eyz 6mo ago
> Most of it's here for a reason. Your argument for host os, virtual os, container is the very point im making. Rather than solve for security and installablity, we built more tooling, more layers of abstraction. Each have overhead,
141.
by zer00eyz 6mo ago
SABRE, is a reminder that things that are well designed just work. How many banks and ERP's, how many accounting systems are still running COBOL scripts? (A lot). Think about modern web infrastructure and how we deploy... cpu -> hyp
142.
by zer00eyz 6mo ago
Everything that is old is new again. Payment processing, is better than it was in 2000, but still not good. Micropayments: this is obnoxiously expensive to do. Discovery, and discoverability: again here we have better but not good solutions
143.
by zer00eyz 6mo ago
From their docs: > We are creating not only a new kind of Git client, Nope, not going to be the tool of the future. The fundamental problem is it is still based on git. Till this addresses submodules and makes them a first class citizen
144.
by zer00eyz 7mo ago
Not at all, Im saying that in the before time, complexity emerged over time (staff changes, feature creep). AI coding (and its volume) is just speed running this issue.
145.
by zer00eyz 7mo ago
It never started that way. Time, feature changes, bugs, emergent needs of the system all drive these sorts of changes. No amount of "clean code" is going to eliminate these problems in the long term. All AI is doing is speed runni
146.
by zer00eyz 7mo ago
> Disagree with the overall argument. It's leaning in a good direction, but the author clearly lacks the language and understanding to articulate the actual problem, or a solution. They simply dont know what they dont know. > Hum
147.
by zer00eyz 7mo ago
I love this! The pure weight of it is amazing, and distinctly makes a statement. Its a fun concept one could play with if they were making their own! I think a "clean" and "contemporary" version of this would look amazin
148.
by zer00eyz 7mo ago
Sure, and we basically force users to choose one or two providers. Some of these are compelled to serve rural customers as well. I live in the SF Bay Area, and have Sonic internet. 10gbe for 60 bucks a month. I ended up building my own rout
149.
by zer00eyz 7mo ago
This article is describing a problem that is still two steps removed from where AI code becomes actually useful. 90 percent of the things users want either A) dont exist or B) are impossible to find, install and run without being deeply tec
150.
by zer00eyz 7mo ago
The intersection of disciplines. Sir Roger Penrose, on quantum consciousness (and there is some regret on his part here) -- OR -- Jacob Barandes for a much more current thinking on this sort of intersectional exploratory thinking.

More ›