Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zen928
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
91.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
A moving goalpost isn't a great argument either.
92.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
Replies like yours is why they made that post.
93.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
watched a political commentary with the primary cast having views similar to yours pretty recently, i believe the most applicable line that would resonate with your intentions would be "the only good bug is a dead bug" chilling st
94.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
I'll pile on since I find your "sudden" confusion on this comment chain to be a disgusting and shameful way to try and engage conversations with other people. The top post tries to identify the results as reducing the hours o
95.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
only if you consider "historical footage" to exclusively mean the "[original] historical footage [stored in archiving]" versus e.g. "historical[ly accurate] footage" if "historical" is going to be use
96.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
After that personality test, they ask you to complete a timed IQ test. After that, you'll reach a behavioral interview after which you get assigned a "take home" technical assessment, which then after submitting you can sched
97.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
Part of dealing with Islamophobia would be dealing with problematic posts like yours ascribing intentions and emotionally charged sentiments to statements that display no such intention. Go ahead and exactly quote the scrutinizable statemen
98.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
It's a word you use when you want to signal to everyone that you'd like to cease having a polite discussion and turn it into a battle of ideologues, very commonly initiated by those who lack introspective processes that fuel the p
99.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
It's a potentially negative financial marker to the success of their business model of selling skins if their skins don't sell, I don't think there's any more sentiment to the statement beyond that
100.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
Will they also be paying what they owe on the added costs that could have been noticed earlier with due diligence? I'm imagining that what they'll receive instead is the compensation expected and agreed upon by both parties negoti
101.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
I know you're really really sad that one person can't hold all similarities to their chosen likeness in copyrighted perpetuity, but it sounds like you have a problem that things are SIMILAR and the artist isn't getting paid f
102.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
Do you need to have the validation from others that your art exists for you to want to create it? If I read every book by only jumping to the final chapter, am I interpretating the work incorrectly or am I not interpretating it how you spec
103.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
People like you having the certainty your freedom to casually engage in these types of topics that may be critical of powerful entities won't result in a form of specific targeting that gives a legally accepted pathway to finding out y
104.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
I think it's an error to conflate the history of commits to being the "history" of the repository, simply because you're putting an assumed expectation that each commit represents a progression from the previous to illus
105.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
Try to not frame general statements through the lens of your worst critics, and to actively give charity while interpretating messages from people who don't demonstrate harmful intent. I don't see anything hostile about someone cl
106.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
I agree that it's sad you agree with this.
107.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
devs have to use it to hoist it to a platform that can accessed by others before users can use it, right? imo users don't typically use open source software, they use generated artifacts from an upstream development process representin
108.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
It's so funny to me seeing variations of this post in response to anything related to what could be seen as a weakness to the actions taken after acquisition, while also seeing this in posts promoting twitters relative stability. It&#x
109.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
I don't agree that companies like boeing failing to secure their own assets properly is taking society hostage, rather than the absolute lax and laid-back approach to digital infrastructure that leads to allowing these weekly emerging
110.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
It seems that misinformation when the crowd of low-life online celebrities who took the chance to relentlessly virtue signal "awareness of mental illness" around Robin William's death will never truly leave us. He was depress
111.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
You don't avoid drowning in water by avoiding water, you avoid it by learning how to swim. In the case that you find it necessary to swim, you now aren't limited to drowning. Your privacy extends beyond what you personally expose,
112.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
Any reason why your doubts have any higher validity than their suppositions? If you want to shut down their viewpoint, you could augment your statement with examples backing the level of confidence you seem to display about your stance des
113.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
Not accounted for in the initial calculation is cost of adoption needing to learn how to apply them in your workflow in the most effecient / least disruptive way to realize the 5% improvement I don't think anyone's against se
114.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
Great resource, thanks for sharing.
115.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
Evidence for the statement that being potentially misrepresentative of your output can be misleading to others and lead to an incorrect conclusion, or that misrepresentable conclusions can be used by deniers to field their viewpoints ...? I
116.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
Calling companies that hold a patent you find valuable and aren't distributing it's use how you personally see fit a "patent troll" isn't just inaccurate, it's an intentional mischaracterization for the purpose
117.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
How do you deal with intentionally harmful actors trying to smear technological progress by repeating specifically dishonestly framed questions living rent free inside your clueless defenders' brains through lite propoganda viral marke
118.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
The added software is their implementation detail, not your individual concern. Presumably, you've given permissions to run the application that didn't change (it was always capable of doing this and you initially agreed) or requi
119.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
> And if it is a thing, one has to be serious about understanding what one can and cannot do about it an understanding sharing much in common with the eye-sore casinos propped up slowly over time in towns and cities around me, especially
120.
▲
by
zen928
3y ago
Is it supposed to be surprising that someone having weight issues would have issues reliably tracking the impacts of actions that would lead to their weight? Have any similar "favorite studies" on hand about alcoholics who underre
More ›