Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zeit_geist
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
correct, but somebody else has put a stamp on it already.
32.
▲
Ask HN: Would you pay for privacy in a social network like Facebook?
7 points
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
|
8 comments
33.
▲
Adaptive and Dynamic Funnel Replication in Clouds (LADIS 2011)
(faculty.ucmerced.edu)
2 points
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
|
0 comments
34.
▲
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
An iPad.
35.
▲
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
Should be part of the standard CS curriculum.
36.
▲
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
I like the idea, but I don't know how it could be applied to people working part-time; say students or folks busy with their PhD.
37.
▲
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
X exported via NX -- works awesomely fast especially over slow links, tethered smartphones, etc.
38.
▲
AWS Post-Mortem
(aws.amazon.com)
145 points
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
|
65 comments
39.
▲
The Buggy Software Blues
(soundcloud.com)
2 points
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
|
0 comments
40.
▲
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
That's easy: buy it. It's the perfect machine to get code done. I wouldn't use it for stress tests though. IMHO it's a task for dedicated machines anyways.
41.
▲
[Paper] MD-HBase: indexing multi-dimensional data on top of HBase
(cs.ucsb.edu)
6 points
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
|
0 comments
42.
▲
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
It's armchair HFT arguments all over.
43.
▲
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
yes, it is a failure.
44.
▲
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
I enjoyed the service although I was wondering about the business model for quite a long time. Sad.
45.
▲
[Paper] Towards Scalable One-Pass Analytics Using MapReduce
(cs.umass.edu)
3 points
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
|
0 comments
46.
▲
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
How I could I miss AWS for so long?! ;p
47.
▲
[Paper] Temporal Index Sharding for Space-Time Efficiency in Archive Search
(iiitd.edu.in)
4 points
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
|
0 comments
48.
▲
Incoop: MapReduce for Incremental Computations
(mpi-sws.org)
3 points
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
|
0 comments
49.
▲
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
a nice blog post, very detailed and I think the methodology somewhat holds. Therefore +1 from me.
50.
▲
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
I understand it's quite early for you now. I can assure oyu, we have looked at all the licenses you mentioned. They all care about the business of sharing code and not the business of making money. This more of a general problem or merely l
51.
▲
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
Actually the proposed license model doesn't waive any author's commercial rights whatsoever. Every author would still have the right to do with his code whatever he/she likes. However, there is restriction about the process of creating a pr
52.
▲
A Call for an Honest and Sustainable OpenSource License
(blog.erlang.de)
8 points
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
|
11 comments
53.
▲
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
Interesting post, but mixes 2 really interesting topics up. I would have loved to learn more about that 2 different thinking styles mentioned.
54.
▲
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
Po, thank you for your great hints. They are all highly appreciated. We will rework our survey accordingly and repost it in some days.
55.
▲
Please help! Anonymous Survey on Real-Time Analytics
(spreadsheets.google.com)
10 points
by
zeit_geist
15y ago
|
7 comments
56.
▲
by
zeit_geist
16y ago
I totally agree with you, except for the competitive advantage part. Commodity stuff, like OpenSource software is in a certain sense, has no intrinsic competitive advantage value. Nevertheless, I really wish you great success with your sta