zauguin

10 ms·

91.
by zauguin 5y ago
Use LuaTeX. It's not bug free, but it is still developed and most bugs there get fixed relatively fast. Also it is much more flexible anyway.
92.
by zauguin 5y ago
Knuth's original are not really raster fonts, they are vectors but in a format which is not supported in other systems so they have to be mapped to raster fonts before being include e.g. in PDF files. The important difference is that y
93.
by zauguin 5y ago
FYI on modern LaTeX engines like LuaLaTeX (and also XeLaTeX) Latin Modern actually is the default. But Latin Modern and the default Type 1 version of Computer Modern have exactly the same thickness, so if Computer Modern looks thinner for y
94.
by zauguin 5y ago
You really want to use LuaLaTeX (if you don't do so already) and then you can just load any font on your system using \usepackage{fontspec} \setmainfont{Whatever your font's name is} Especially you don't have to
95.
by zauguin 5y ago
Wouldn't less annoying Cookie Banners lead to significantly less data? Or maybe asked differently: Is people giving actual informed consent to tracking actually a thing? I mean for most people I know, the reaction to such banners is on
96.
by zauguin 6y ago
While the original TeX engine only get bug fixes these days, that's not really relevant for LaTeX since LaTeX doesn't even support that engine anymore. While pdfTeX development is rather slow too, it does still see feature develop
97.
by zauguin 6y ago
"In particular, NSF requires one-inch margins, but there's no way to force the typesetting engine to strictly respect the margins you set. So at the end you're left to turn the visual margin guides on and check there are no m