zasdffaa

53 ms·

571.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
I can't speak for him, so for myself: some years ago I had to almost beg for a new disk for a server. A disk. I didn't even bother to ask if we could have a bigger server, no point trying.
572.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
$340,800/year. If that doesn't make a material difference to your company or department you've never worked where cash is tight. More bluntly: you've been spoilt with excess resources. That's a lot of cash to waste
573.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
Depends... set the pagefile to something large, run the program. If it doesn't thrash too hard you can observe it to its largest growth. You'd probably want an SSD. Maybe that would work. Maybe.
574.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
> there are some jobs that are dangerous and there's just no way to change that of course there is - just add alcohol! Voila, nao moar dangerous.
575.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
Well, read this < https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide_of_indigenous_peoples... >. It's not very long. Genocide is discussed, depending on defintions of it. Some say genocide, some say it wasn't. I&#x27
576.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
So what are the $%^&* semantics we're supposed to build into the language to avoid the need for speculation via OOO exec and branch prediction. Because as a guy interested in languages you might have something to teach me, assuming
577.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
I'm one of those and rather unsure of its value. The original reason is the modelling of the program as a reducible graph (if I'm not getting confused with other stuff). I occasionally have a couple of returns in one func but only
578.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
They're fictional paper rejections, and very funny (because some are so painfully plausible).
579.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
Your first sentence doesn't answer any question. The second is irrelevant. Please make some concrete suggestions.
580.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
> Fortunately his legacy is continued by "British scaffolders" - a famous sub-group within construction, who you can still see to this day getting utterly shit-faced in a pub on cider over lunch, before returning to site. &#x27
581.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
> C has no concept of vectorization OK, but vectorisation is exposed by the instruction set, as instructions[1] > speculative execution, branch prediction, ... caches, MMUs How would you expose speculative execution & branch predi
582.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
Aztecs weren't charming in this regard and by that probably sowed the seeds of their own defeat by pushing other tribes to support the invading spaniards, but the conquistadors went in for full on genocide, totally deliberately.
583.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
Right. I'm a brit - now that should make it clearer - I'm not on that continent. If you were, yes, I can see your point, there should by my argument be more exposure therefore uderstanding. And there was no education about aztecs,
584.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
Oh give over. Norse gods are european, and with greek, roman and egyption gods, we've had thousands of years awareness & contact with those cultures. > who were considered inferior by the europeans who "conquered" them
585.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
This surprises me as I read a lot about Aztecs and their iconography was described by an expert as 'dense and obscure' and i never found good examples of any of it, so this is ... interesting. Some doubts, the 'blood drops&#x
586.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
I've read that 'tl' was similar to the welsh 'll' sound (a kind of hissy L sound, though not really, youtube will have some spoken examples) but when I've heard 'tl' spoken it usually sounds like a &#
587.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
Thanks. I'd be very interested. I originally had added the HAVING clause to nastify it further, because this would cause values to appear and disappear, so to handle that you (probably?) have to materialise the entire result of the GRO
588.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
We may be talking very different things. From the postgres docs, a sample materialised view < https://www.postgresqltutorial.com/postgresql-views/postgres... > (I did a few tweaks as marked) CREATE MATERIALIZE
589.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
So does Pgres & mssql, but general views that are incrementally updated - that's another matter. I'd be very surprised (and pleased).
590.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
Damn, that's a good question! Or security in general. But I wouldn't blame them at all if they didn't do it. Good thought though.
591.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
There are too many questions here. What does it not do? What's the overhead of monitoring the main DB and how's it done - triggers? Does it need schema changes? What about race conditions - can you guarantee none? What's the
592.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
could you elaborate please - is all of youtube including the streaming, all python?
593.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
Get beyond a certain size of python program and you lose dev time. IOW you lose both. It's not a huge size either.
594.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
Welcome to being me decades ago - except I was even crapper. 1st off, don't fret too much. Some people learn x and think they know it all. You and I learn x and realise we don't know a, b, c, d... and lose confidence. Don't.
595.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
Depends. In the first it will depend on the branch predictor which will depend on the relative expected magnitudes of num and x In the 2nd, which I assume should be { return num*num > x * x; } then it depends on the micro-arch,
596.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
Same (edit: no permanent damage done yet but now I keep tbird minimised to prevent this kind of bad stuff from keybindings). And I went back to webmail for 6 weeks because when tbird upgraded itself, the new OAuth (I think) stuff needed coo
597.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
Structure... but 'language'? Not the same thing.
598.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
> I suppose the danger is believing that we are substantively different to people who came before us genetically no, morally - well perhaps somewhat. Arguably. Maybe. Can you really rule it out? > or that our current moral beliefs are
599.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
> ...whales clearly have a structured language Well, that's new to me. References?
600.
by zasdffaa 4y ago
Questions, then, genuine interest in how you see this (not looking for flames). What is wrong with judging then by the standards of now ? If we did as you seem to suggest and not judge, wouldn't that negate the ability to learn from

More ›