zappb

9 ms·

61.
by zappb 2y ago
Like Curb and the numerous taxi specific apps?
62.
by zappb 2y ago
That’s copyright and patent law for you! Imaginary property is all about rent seeking.
63.
by zappb 2y ago
Sounds like a prison work camp!
64.
by zappb 2y ago
Not one that literally fucks my users up the ass!
65.
by zappb 2y ago
Still mad about Amalek.
66.
by zappb 2y ago
It’d be great if the Apache Nations wanted to control the domain name, but they’re still mostly concerned with basics like clean water and other government services.
67.
by zappb 2y ago
Things like Maven and numerous other XML namespaces come to mind that can’t exactly move. Then there’s the tons of dirty money to be made by domain squatting apache.org even if all the technical problems were solved because the site has a r
68.
by zappb 2y ago
Maintaining the trademark requires continued use of Apache. Without the domain name in control, the security implications are disastrous considering how much legacy technology has the domain name hard coded.
69.
by zappb 2y ago
I wonder if they’ll disable ordering on Sundays similar to how some Jewish sites disable forms on Saturdays.
70.
by zappb 2y ago
That’s essentially the argument they used in the past to regulate intrastate commerce of cannabis.
71.
by zappb 2y ago
Software dev machines continue to increase in memory. I’ve seen some using 96 GB in laptops!
72.
by zappb 2y ago
Indeed, it’s the usual Islamofascist propaganda.
73.
Buy this legislation or we'll kill the internet(wsj.com)
2 points by zappb 2y ago|0 comments
74.
by zappb 2y ago
Game theory proves otherwise. Defectors must be punished to maintain a stable system.
75.
by zappb 2y ago
That’s similar to eminent domain, a right granted to the government in the constitution.
76.
by zappb 2y ago
Such childish actions are derisive.
77.
by zappb 3y ago
Those are bottle prices, not shot prices, right?
78.
by zappb 3y ago
Commercial copyright interests will always seek to maximize their control over the devices that play back copyrighted stuff. Banks at least have more legitimate security concerns since they involve the end user getting screwed rather than t
79.
by zappb 3y ago
Just one of the many reasons why currencies require nation state backing.
80.
by zappb 3y ago
The right for entrepreneurs to make a profit trumps users’ rights to privacy and security.
81.
by zappb 3y ago
China represents twice as many people as the EU. This is not an enticing argument. Can you at least qualify this with democratic representation?
82.
by zappb 3y ago
That was because Microsoft abused their monopoly in operating systems at the time to force OEMs to use their OS on all their computers in order to maintain the industry discounts on OEM licensing.
83.
by zappb 3y ago
It’s not unique to Apple. It’s an inherent problem to securing Turing machines.
84.
by zappb 3y ago
That subreddit has been a forum for nation-state trolls for a long time.
85.
by zappb 3y ago
Huh, these posts usually get hundreds of replies. What gives?
86.
by zappb 3y ago
Companies already tried offshoring several years ago. It was a disaster for any core competencies, and companies already make extensive use of offshoring (and near shoring). This isn’t going to happen suddenly.
87.
by zappb 3y ago
The suburbs aren’t necessarily a low cost of living area, especially suburbs of SF, NY, Seattle, etc. The LCOL areas would be more rural or non-coastal states in general.
88.
by zappb 3y ago
Corporations are made up of people. LLMs are merely programs.
89.
by zappb 3y ago
I believe that’s the joke, yeah.
90.
by zappb 3y ago
This argument assumes that economics is a zero sum game which is easily disproven by history.

More ›