zackify

27 ms·

361.
by zackify 9y ago
Love that people think you go through rigorous checks to get one of these. I was able to get one for my personal domain just by saying “oh yeah that’s owned by this company too”. A simple Whois lookup would have shown otherwise. These CA’s
362.
by zackify 9y ago
I’m working on a full pbx server in nodejs that will be scalable out of the box. Extendable. And with awesome docs! We started just one week ago on the sip sever side of things. https://github.com/encryption/sip
363.
by zackify 9y ago
How about: When is iPhone X support coming? It's not that hard to update.... I've done it myself.
364.
by zackify 9y ago
Because that wouldn't solve half the problems and some things just aren't possible. Building off existing open source phone solutions is like asking a team to continue building on top of garbage code, have you looked at the FreePB
365.
Show HN: Contact form submission endpoint using Docker(github.com)
1 points by zackify 9y ago|0 comments
366.
by zackify 9y ago
Thanks for all the tips! Yes I have been reading through the SIP RFC’s haha. Making this for the company I work at so I have a small amount of phones. I may publish a list of the ones the library will support. But I figure, if it gets big e
367.
by zackify 9y ago
Every suggestion will be Asterisk / FreeSwitch (have fun learning how to configure it all and good luck coming back to it in a year) or a hosted solution, this is what I want to solve :) I will admit I am new to this field but that is
368.
by zackify 9y ago
For me, I want something that immediately works with local phones and local calling, built in admin panel that shows active calls, transfer calls, build out prompts for conferencing, 1st class iOS / Android support. Web app integration
369.
by zackify 9y ago
just starting on it now. https://github.com/encryption/pbx . See my reply above :) Thanks
370.
by zackify 9y ago
Funny seeing this on HN the day I start building a PBX system that supports SIP and WebRTC in node. There's really nothing open source out there, that isn't 10 years old and horrible. Hopefully I can knock down some marketshare th
371.
by zackify 9y ago
Awesome, makes perfect sense :) I get why you guys have to do this now.
372.
by zackify 9y ago
Just feels like you're halfway following good JS practices. Ex: using Vue is great, but still rendering templates the "old way" instead of server rendering correctly for the whole app and having components remount. Totally ge
373.
by zackify 9y ago
This is not the same as what gitlab is doing. React had attributes in order to remount correctly on the client side after a server render, this was removed. Using the latest react versions have nothing on the dom that isn't specificall
374.
by zackify 9y ago
HTML is for displaying information, not being littered with things js needs to query for and access. That's the whole point of using something like vue? Put a function on the vue component that will make a request, keep all the data st
375.
by zackify 9y ago
Why is GitLab putting data into their html? "You can pass your endpoints in through the data attributes." Why store endpoints and other js related data on a DOM element. This sounds like a left over paradigm they kept from their j
376.
by zackify 9y ago
Lol love how I get downvotes for stating facts
377.
by zackify 9y ago
"The old things likely have bugs" Do you even have experience with React? It sounds like you don't. Because there's no "bugs" with using createClass or proptypes, it's simply been split out into a separate
378.
by zackify 9y ago
Scss is so annoying and if you ask me, slows builds down a ton in development. Also, that uglify stuff is annoying! Thankfully they are adding es6 support but most guides are outdated.... I feel you...
379.
by zackify 9y ago
"Downloading a pre-built image from a registry does not count as reproducibility, to me." Completely disagree... On my team, the lead devs build the docker images, push them to a private repo, and everyone else pulls that exact im
380.
by zackify 9y ago
The config is pretty straight forward once you understand how it all works. The docs have example configs for anything you need. Specify an entry point, add some loaders, and maybe a plugin or two, what are you stuck on?
381.
by zackify 9y ago
What were you trying to make work that you couldn't figure out?
382.
by zackify 9y ago
There's one metric Google's lighthouse doesn't look for, and it's huge to me. Speed while switching pages on a PWA, and if there's a loading spinner on every single page change, whether you loaded it or not. A site
383.
by zackify 9y ago
Looks just like the Freepbx codebase, but that's php https://github.com/FreePBX/core/blob/release/13.0/Core.class...
384.
by zackify 9y ago
This isn't viable for large files. First uploading to your server, then through to S3. It will take a long time. Have your api return the upload url and then when you switch providers, instead use their signed url? AWS and Google you j
385.
by zackify 9y ago
I setup webpack myself on larger apps. There’s a lot of configuration options that you can’t change in CRA without ejecting. Changing how modules are loaded, changing options for css loading or svgs, for example. I prefer to start my own in
386.
Supercharging Front End Development with VS Code(zach.codes)
2 points by zackify 9y ago|0 comments
387.
by zackify 9y ago
yes, but in my case I use google cloud I blogged about it: https://zach.codes/deploying-node-to-cloud-functions/
388.
by zackify 9y ago
Same here, but using express.js. People seem to think you have to make a new function for any little piece of your api
389.
My Journey to Becoming a Better Programmer – The Intro(dlea.ch)
6 points by zackify 9y ago|0 comments
390.
by zackify 9y ago
I've been using the same JS framework for 3+ years. I don't agree with all of these complaints on JS churn being too much. Web components aren't the answer either.

More ›