yusyusyus

11 ms·

61.
by yusyusyus 8y ago
sounds good. until you run conferencing services or whatever. Then the pricing is pretty simple: buying wholesale SIP and operating on your own is substantially cheaper. irl maintenance is pretty straightforward. I do it as a side thing to
62.
by yusyusyus 9y ago
yes. it makes reading logs easier.
63.
by yusyusyus 9y ago
Similarly, copper is faster than glass too (but not faster than air). The trade folks refer to copper in terms of "velocity factor". Example, some arbitrary RG-6 I'm looking at has a velocity factor of 81%. Equivalent refract
64.
by yusyusyus 9y ago
My sentiment has been that this high school-level authoritarianism seems to be in vogue on a larger cultural level than just educational settings. Largely, status quo maintenance is seen as a positive, so don't rock the boat, don'
65.
by yusyusyus 9y ago
A big shining place is in DDoS mitigation. We demo'ed some in-house built replacements for $VENDOR and found it to be cost-effective to do some more easily implemented parts in-house. Based on some of my discussions with folks, I think
66.
by yusyusyus 9y ago
Some differences between the airplane analogy and the nuclear plant analogy: 1) When a plane fails catastrophically, the impact is limited to a smaller geographical area. 2) Pollution from the failure of a plane doesn't involve what is
67.
by yusyusyus 9y ago
I actually _have_ seen PIPs work out. Pretty rare though. In this context though, I believe it was done because of stack ranking, so perhaps the person PIPed was not actually "undesirable" so much as the manager had to pick someon
68.
by yusyusyus 9y ago
> I can't say about TCAM performance alone. Are there super fast or are there able to perform parallel lookup? I think this doc[0] helps to understand the parallelism/performance from a TCAM perspective. [0] https://
69.
by yusyusyus 9y ago
yes! It is probably more accurate to think of NTT as many smaller companies. These guys are from GIN and are some of the best people I've had the pleasure of working with, both on a personal and professional level.
70.
by yusyusyus 9y ago
This may be true in the situation you're looking at. In neither of the community colleges that I have been to has this been the case. We've been in real laboratory sciences with skilled instructors and successful students have gon
71.
by yusyusyus 9y ago
Another way of doing this is looking at LRN database and hitting the voicemail access numbers for the carrier. Often times the pilot number will let you dial a mailbox directly.
72.
by yusyusyus 9y ago
Sometimes, too, corporate travel fun mandates the lowest fare. So even if i would pay $25 for some extra legroom, I cannot!
73.
by yusyusyus 10y ago
Route server operators would prefer people didn't do something like this against their devices.
74.
by yusyusyus 10y ago
It would require a warrant for grabbing email versus today's law which only requires a simple subpoena after 180 days.
75.
by yusyusyus 10y ago
similarly, x.509 is supported in a variant[0] of OpenSSH. For certain kinds of devices, this may be preferable. [0] http://roumenpetrov.info/secsh/
76.
by yusyusyus 10y ago
nice! i saw one of these very recently at a friends house. we were marveling at how this would have been much better than the old rollers.
77.
by yusyusyus 10y ago
My counterargument is that Tomahawk LC (the third generation LCs referenced by parent) are just NP5 and Mellanox just picked up EzChip. I imagine you'll see whitebox competitors targeting large swaths that use ASR9K for the datapath re
78.
by yusyusyus 10y ago
Who says that these DIDs are even assigned to the caller? Virtually all wholesale termination (the fancy word for handling outbound calls) allows for the caller to set the calling party ID to whatever the caller desires. The reason for this
79.
by yusyusyus 11y ago
NAT is so painful. Even the specs are written with grossly overloaded terminology. >The reason I call it toxic is that the idea that NAT helps security is a harmful superstition that spooks people about IPv6 adoption. In all fairness, th
80.
by yusyusyus 11y ago
Appreciate Cumulus' work in this area. As a network "engineer", the burden of administering switches is horrible. Downside is though, getting more switch SoCs talking to Linux makes me wish I wasn't automating configs ri
81.
by yusyusyus 11y ago
Not supporting it because why though? IP multicast routing requires end-to-end state for each (source , group). Further, the boxes on the market for doing multicast (not a little GPCPU router) have limitations concerning how they do multica
82.
by yusyusyus 12y ago
no. this is a limitation specific to MURS, from their explaination[0]. MURS band is cooler for them though because of longer lamdba. but the longer lambda = further propagation / power (a general rule anyway). so, FCC would rather not
83.
by yusyusyus 12y ago
quite a few of the providers in Texas are exactly the opposite strangely.. they bill a surcharge for using less than some fixed KWh. i.e. I get charged $5 if i use less than ~500KWh in a month.
84.
by yusyusyus 12y ago
there are similar mechanisms in the US . in many cities, a landlord is required to register a tenant. similarly, purchase of real property is public record...
85.
by yusyusyus 12y ago
How does this architecture address PFS? I'm guessing a future version would require the exchange of DH private key to make it work...
86.
by yusyusyus 12y ago
a few things... 1) there is a 1 gig inband channel to CPU. the traffic prioritization referred to (selective packet discard) really doesn't matter at the point in which the inband channel is saturated. when you start punting large amou
87.
by yusyusyus 12y ago
I would advise against interrupt-based syscalls in for x86 platforms in linux... a lot of optimization work has been done for x86-32 via vDSO (and, afaik, x86-64 interrupt-based syscalls are just there for compatibility reasons, but I'
88.
by yusyusyus 13y ago
More or less this. Also, in some places, email is the only reliable way to ensure the receiving party is held responsible for responding (sad that it is needed, I know).
89.
by yusyusyus 13y ago
This is simple misinformation. Most places will only say that much so as to limit unnecessary liability but, in most locales, an entity is not explicitly prohibited from providing additional information with respect to performance, etc.
90.
by yusyusyus 13y ago
Yes. 1099 your ass and don't you dare ask for 1.5x OT while paying $8.50/hr and doing 50-60 hour weeks. Or 'unpaid internships'. You can argue the experience, but the law is the law.

More ›