yupper32

52 ms·

1. 571.▲
   by yupper32 5y ago

   Are you for real? Man, who would have thought "not yelling at your employees isn't an accomplishment" would be controversial... > Should the anti-slavery campaigners of the 1800s receive no admiration, despite social norms
2. 572.▲
   by yupper32 5y ago

   That still doesn't mean that not yelling should receive any sort of admiration. You don't get bonus points for doing what should be the bare minimum, regardless of what the current norms are.
3. 573.▲
   by yupper32 5y ago

   > He tells Bill Burr that he had followed Roy around for a full day, going to all his restaurants and food trucks, and not once did Roy raise his voice to his staff. Sorry what are you trying to say here? It's admirable or difficult
4. 574.▲
   by yupper32 5y ago

   Tech companies don't need a specific therapy app to know if you have anxiety. If they wanted to be nefarious in this way, they could just mine your chats and emails and get a great idea about your state of mind. They wouldn't even
5. 575.▲
   by yupper32 5y ago

   Regardless of the merit of this particular fine, what happens when every country realizes they can just arbitrarily fine huge international companies to fund their countries? In theory all 50 countries that Google has offices could fine the
6. 576.▲
   by yupper32 5y ago

   I'm nearly speechless reading these replies. What makes you ask this question? Is it privilege? Ignorance? We aren't talking about a silly pet project. We're talking about important government websites that need to be availab