yunohn

26 ms·

481.
by yunohn 3y ago
This looks very similar to an opinionated boilerplate, rather than a low-code competitor. IMHO that’s a tough commoditized space, and your value add is not clear to me…
482.
by yunohn 3y ago
There’s incredible competition in this space already - I’d highly recommend outright stating your future pricing plans, instead of a bait-and-switch later.
483.
by yunohn 3y ago
If you really want to experiment, give Cursor a try. It’s free up to a limit, so maybe it’ll be enough for your example use case. It handles even more complex use cases and will automatically include/patch code for you via the inbuilt
484.
by yunohn 3y ago
Why is this both free and closed source? Ideally, when you advertise privacy-first, I’d like to see a GitHub link with real source code. Or I’d rather pay for it to ensure you have a financial incentive to not sell my data.
485.
by yunohn 3y ago
This is actually a great question for which I found an interesting attempt: https://andys.page/posts/llm_sampling_strategies/ (No affiliation)
486.
by yunohn 3y ago
Like sibling commenter mentioned, simonw’s blog is a great resource. Regarding your point around being able to whip up the code yourself - the point is to have a decent starting point to save time and energy. Like you said, you know the edg
487.
by yunohn 3y ago
Yeah honestly, I think you have a completely different expectation and style of usage than what is optimal with LLMs. I don’t have the energy to convince you further, but maybe one day it’ll click for you? No worries either way.
488.
by yunohn 3y ago
> found it lackluster for the domain I asked it for Fair, that is possible depending on your domain. > It's no good at writing algorithms or data structures In my experience, this is untrue. I’ve gotten it to write algorithms wit
489.
by yunohn 3y ago
> Why AWS, Google and Oracle Are Backing the Valkey Redis Fork Because they don’t want to pay? Simple answer. The article also says as much.
490.
by yunohn 3y ago
So the justification given is that if police find a scaled grow house operation going on, the landlord is fined and the house is seized/boarded up. So they are softly incentivized to regularly inspect and prevent such a situation. Howe
491.
by yunohn 3y ago
> How about the horrible smoke produced by those who drive cars? It's super reckless to expose others to negative side-effects by somebody who can't control themselves and must drive alone on the highway back and forth to work
492.
by yunohn 3y ago
Yes, I did read it. I’m kind of tired of HNers loudly proclaiming they are ignoring LLMs more than a year into this paradigm shift. Is it that hard to input a prompt into the free version of ChatGPT and see how it helps with programming?
493.
by yunohn 3y ago
The article even has quotes from moralistic conservatives who would love to add more special words to cover their long list of sins.
494.
by yunohn 3y ago
This is the case in the Netherlands, despite a better legalization status. I’ve never seen a rental allow growing cannabis. Some larger rental agencies even perform yearly inspections.
495.
by yunohn 3y ago
In my experience in Europe, the primary roadblock is the controlling moralistic conservatism exhibited by critics like those quoted in the article.
496.
by yunohn 3y ago
I assume Lennart Poettering, creator of systemd et all. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lennart_Poettering
497.
by yunohn 3y ago
> I don't use LLMs for my coding, I manage just fine with LSP and Treesitter. You’re literally comparing apples to oranges.
498.
by yunohn 3y ago
> there is a very heavy atmosphere in the open source community of excommunicating anyone who dares to ask for payment as heathens of the vilest order I fully agree that forcing payment or using dual licensing is unfortunately heavily fr
499.
by yunohn 3y ago
100% this. I don’t know why this obvious angle is being ignored. The other puppet accounts had Indian and German names - it’s very clear they were trying to obscure their real origins.
500.
by yunohn 3y ago
Who is the employer? I’m all for supporting open source and am a maintainer and contributor myself, but I don’t think blindly stating it should be a job is the solution.
501.
by yunohn 3y ago
I don’t understand this view of “If I give someone unsolicited money, they will do what I want”.
502.
by yunohn 3y ago
Huh? So anyone who asks/says something in OSS, should just throw money into the ring to have an opinion?
503.
by yunohn 3y ago
I’m not cherry picking. It’s just weird to see yet-another-editor in 2024, with developers having to reinvent everything from scratch. I mean, half the comments here are disappointed that plugins will need to be coded in Steel/Scheme.
504.
by yunohn 3y ago
No, I think devs just love pointlessly tinkering with new tools all the time - I’m guilty of this myself too.
505.
by yunohn 3y ago
That’s not how the WASM sandbox usually works - it has a very limited API surface and can only take specified inputs. https://docs.wasmtime.dev/security.html
506.
by yunohn 3y ago
My point is less around usage and prevalence, and more around reimplementing basic paradigms ad infinitum.
507.
by yunohn 3y ago
A WASM setup should completely sandbox the plugin so even with malicious code, it would not have access to anything sensitive.
508.
by yunohn 3y ago
Quite frankly, reading these release notes addressing basic features like toggling block comments is just… Makes me wonder why we engineers love reinventing the wheel with new text editors, all at various levels of brokenness.
509.
by yunohn 3y ago
How does this compare to Tauri?
510.
by yunohn 3y ago
The first clause sucks, but I’m perfectly happy with the second one.

More ›