Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ytoawwhra92
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
2mo ago
> - based on liberal principles of voluntary participation rather than on totalitarian principles like most other proposals Well, except for children, who under this proposal don't get to participate in anything online that hasn
32.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
2mo ago
> You are talking about leaving "everything" to the parents. > Those are extreme positions. It's a very extreme position, and yet on every HN thread about digital ID there are multiple, upvoted, top-level comments sugge
33.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
2mo ago
You are saying something quite different to the comment I responded to: > The right people to protect children are those responsible for them - their parents and guardians. My position is that there is a social responsibility to protect
34.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
2mo ago
No ID checks at clubs, bars, or other adults-only venues. No school zone speed limits, or protected crossings on streets near schools. No requirements for railings on public balconies, fencing around public pools, protective covers over dra
35.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
2mo ago
> The large upfront cost is lower than it would be because its subsidized by buying the games for it! This isn't true anymore.
36.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
2mo ago
UBI is inherently inflationary and as far as I can tell there's no solution to that problem.
37.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
3mo ago
How would you even form convictions in such a world?
38.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
3mo ago
Has an LLM ever intentionally made you laugh? Cry?
39.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
3mo ago
The cost of asserting your 4th amendment right in this situation is that you have to sue the US government after you leave the airport, or invoke the 4th amendment as your defence if they charge you with one or more crimes. I think most peo
40.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
3mo ago
Relevant reading for you: https://www.aclu.org/documents/constitution-100-mile-border-... And no, they wouldn’t have denied him entry, but they would have seized his device.
41.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
3mo ago
IMO people are better off knowing their actual rights in a US airport than trying to outsmart the US government.
42.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
3mo ago
CBP are empowered to seize devices if the owner refuses a search.
43.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
3mo ago
> But again where is the crime? Destruction or removal of property to prevent seizure. CBP are empowered to search US citizens devices and, if the citizen refuses to comply, to seize that device. They'll be alleging that by knowingl
44.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
3mo ago
Not required at an airport, for whatever reason.
45.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
3mo ago
This problem pre-dates the current administration. Safe to say it has bipartisan support. https://www.aclu.org/documents/constitution-100-mile-border-...
46.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
3mo ago
I think almost all countries do this if your name is on a list (as this person's is). It's the nature of the lists and what gets your name added to them that varies from country to country.
47.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
4mo ago
Copyright and patent law aren't relevant to this discussion. We're talking about goods that are purchased and then later rendered unusable by the seller.
48.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
4mo ago
Do you genuinely believe that property rights diminish as the utility derived from property increases?
49.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
4mo ago
Doesn't seem fair to the people who have already paid for a product that will stop working.
50.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
4mo ago
Fortunately, Stop Killing Games isn't looking to mandate any one solution to this problem. There are many possible ways to enable game preservation and SKG is pushing for game studios to pick one and implement it, instead of not doing
51.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
4mo ago
One thing I've noticed with other streaming media is that it keeps changing in often subtle ways that I just don't appreciate. Albums will be replaced with remastered, "deluxe", or anniversary editions with different v
52.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
4mo ago
> This is an observation and not a judgement. Take what you will with this information. Why bring it up at all if you're not trying to say anything? Birth rate correlates with home ownership rate for people aged 25-34. Wonder why th
53.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
4mo ago
And people don't believe we're in a literacy crisis. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48532053
54.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
4mo ago
"Calcifications not found" is a different statement from "no calcifications". Even then, the context that "ultrasound isn't a great way to assess for calcification" is important when reading either stateme
55.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
4mo ago
Education has existed in some form since prehistory. Grading didn't become widespread until the 1940s.
56.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
4mo ago
The report you're referring to counts anyone who didn't directly inherit their wealth as "self-made". For example, it counts Zuckerberg and Bezos as self-made, despite both of them receiving substantial amounts of money
57.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
4mo ago
> _their home_ It's not their home. They can't walk in, wipe their shoes on the hallway rug, make a pot of coffee, use the bathroom, turn on the TV, and take a nap on the couch. At least not without their tenant's invitati
58.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
4mo ago
I also struggled immensely in the early days. For me there was no turning point. Just a realisation one day that the good was outweighing the bad, and it had been for a while. > I look forward to all the things I could do for her. Look f
59.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
4mo ago
For pure logic I find refactoring to enable divergence much easier than implementing convergence.
60.
▲
by
ytoawwhra92
4mo ago
> About a third of people in the US have a bachelor's degree, but only 13% can pass level 4/5 literacy challenge? Yes, that's how bad the problem is. I've worked with people with master's degrees who can't c
More ›