yrro

26 ms·

1. 331.▲
   by yrro 3y ago

   Now if only they'd kill implicit function declarations too...
2. 332.▲
   by yrro 3y ago

   If only there was some sort of system of domain names that could be used to indicate the demarcation points...
3. 333.▲
   by yrro 3y ago

   > GitLab plans to improve its customers' DevSecOps workflow efficiency by 10x, by applying AI-assisted workflows How about GitLab fix the most elemental mistakes they have made with the k8s operator for GitLab runner instead of... w
4. 334.▲
   by yrro 3y ago

   Oh, I thought this was a decision made by my IT department.
5. 335.▲
   by yrro 3y ago

   Nothing new under the sun. Edge ain't done 'till Chrome don't run...
6. 336.▲
   by yrro 3y ago

   There is some confusion because there _are_ DRM systems that require users to use Secure Boot with a TPM: https://www.reddit.com/r/pcgaming/comments/phutif/riot_games...
7. 337.▲
   by yrro 3y ago

   I can seldom resist the opportunity to quote a footnote from Good Omens, by Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman: "NOTE FOR YOUNG PEOPLE AND AMERICANS: One shilling = Five Pee. It helps to understand the antique finances of the Witchfinder
8. 338.▲
   by yrro 3y ago

   This actaully happened last year. The then Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, was in a spot of political bother and it looked like the then Queen was going to sack him, as she must (according to the conventions that comprise the UK's const
9. 339.▲
   by yrro 3y ago

   Ugh I wish v4l2loopback was in the upstream kernel...
10. 340.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    Electricity is clearly far too cheap in their area! :)
11. 341.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    Born: 29 July 2015 Died: May 2024^W^WOct 2025 Not a bad run!
12. 342.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    It's the switches job to drop traffic from rogue routers/DHCP servers. Look up RA Guard and DHCPv6 guard. You also need to worry about rogue DHCP(v4) servers too. DHCP Snooping takes care of that. If you're that paranoid then
13. 343.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    > Assume you rely entirely on SLAAC, because that's the preferred way, or so they said. Who's "they"? I think RA for addressing/DNS and stateless DHCPv6 for everything else is the way to go these days.
14. 344.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    nftables' `inet` table sees traffic from both IPv6 and IPv4. Why anything still uses iptables is beyond me!
15. 345.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    > Pump all the heat Is this feasible given how the unwanted heat is spread throughout the atmosphere and ocean? > into one big black body radiator until it glows red hot, then divert the emanating radiation out into space. The atmosph
16. 346.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    If you only want to put a dumb web app behind a proxy then use oauth-proxy. But OAuth caters for a lot more than that use case.
17. 347.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    oauth-proxy?
18. 348.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    It's all very well if you _have_ an IPv4 address range. But if you don't you're screwed. IPv6 fixes this, it should be adopted everywhere. Those against it seem to be the same ones who make money from the artificial scarcity
19. 349.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    It's a new company, the £30 pcm is an introductory price, after 2 years it's £40 and by then prices will probably have risen anyway. Still a great deal, except for needing to pay £5 extra pcm for a routable static IPv4 address.
20. 350.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    To be fair cgroupsv1 and the original tooling around them weren't so great. And people were stuck with them for aaaaaages because the cpu controller wasn't ported to v2 for so long. And then they were still stuck on v1 because of
21. 351.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    FreeOTP recently gained support for backups to local file storage or cloud providers. The backups are encrypted with a passphrase, so the cloud provider can't obtain your OTP keys.
22. 352.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    Hmm... where do we pump the heat to?
23. 353.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    A brand new UK ISP, YouFibre, is providing FttP in many UK cities. It's incredible being able to get a symmetric 1 Gbit connection for £30 pcm. It's also incredible that, despite putting all their users behind CGNAT, they don&#x27
24. 354.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.40/ld/Options.html#in...
25. 355.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    Isn't this what protected linkage is for?
26. 356.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    > If you have those, you can essentially impersonate anyone. Once. This would be immediately detected through Certificate Transparency and there would be front-page headlines around the world about the chaos that ensued as vendors issued
27. 357.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    It just feels crap that if I register as123125125.net then it might be taken off me just because a bunch of network operators can't be bothered to use the DNS properly. You're quite right about the original intended purpose of .ne
28. 358.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    I wonder why on earth this wasn't done properly by reserving, say, as.arpa. or at least using your AS number beneath a (properly registered) asn.net?
29. 359.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    I don't think this change allows them to cancel your domain except for the purposes listed in sec. 2.7(b)(ii).
30. 360.▲
    by yrro 3y ago

    Is there an alternative? Just because you "bought" a domain gives you the right to use it to, say, co-ordinate a botnet that attacks other Internet systems?