yjftsjthsd-h

4 ms·

31.
by yjftsjthsd-h 20d ago
> It is incredibly memory inefficient and will cause the user's machine to crash. Not everyone is running the latest ThinkPad or Macbook with 64GB RAM. Thankfully, you don't need that: > Lastly, we have an upper-bound on the
32.
by yjftsjthsd-h 20d ago
It's a good idea, and the implementation works. Are there actual problems, or are you just complaining that AI was used?
33.
by yjftsjthsd-h 20d ago
There's a JIT, so running the same thing more than once makes it faster: ~ # time hello Hello, world! real 0m 1.89s user 0m 0.67s sys 0m 1.14s ~ # time hello Hello, world! real 0m 0.97s user 0m 0.36s sys 0m 0.55
34.
by yjftsjthsd-h 20d ago
> we can run a Linux kernel in WebAssembly. For a moment I thought someone did a port of Linux to wasm, but this is actually x86_64 Linux in a wasm qemu (with JIT, granted, which I suppose blurs the line). That's probably a lot more
35.
by yjftsjthsd-h 20d ago
... Then why would they care that it's ND?
36.
by yjftsjthsd-h 21d ago
No, they don't only increase attack surface. In particular, uBo reduces attack surface a lot more than it increases it.
37.
by yjftsjthsd-h 21d ago
Yeah, I'm really not sure that's a joke; binary packages, optionally combined with a prefix install, seem like a great fit.
38.
by yjftsjthsd-h 21d ago
Sweet, thanks. I guess running in a VM is also a bonus protective layer:)
39.
by yjftsjthsd-h 21d ago
I'm willing to believe that stock chrome has a better record than stock Firefox, but > and on top of it you’re recommending an extension as a security measure ... Yes? Why can a browser extension not be a security measure/impro
40.
by yjftsjthsd-h 21d ago
Wait, you have that working? What's the lowest friction to run it? Like, VM or docker container or...
41.
by yjftsjthsd-h 21d ago
Yes, GOS is probably a direct improvement over stock android; I would also describe that as suboptimal from a user freedom perspective. Really, most of my beef with GOS is that its developers strongly object to user-controlled root. On my
42.
by yjftsjthsd-h 22d ago
> For the freedom and security nerds they’re better off with GrapheneOS on Pixel or whatever upcoming Motorola phones will support it. Not quite. The people who care about security first are better off with GOS, yes. However, GOS's
43.
by yjftsjthsd-h 23d ago
Weird. Maybe it's a Windows thing? Not sure why that would be though
44.
by yjftsjthsd-h 23d ago
> I just started a two fresh profiles to test your claim (one in Firefox, one in Dev Edition), the opt-out for telemetry is present in the very first dialogue box and costs 2 clicks. And now I'm confused. Firefox 153 on Linux, new p
45.
by yjftsjthsd-h 24d ago
> With an aerospike, you have an expensive engine that you don't want to drop (because it's perfectly efficient at every altitude) but now you have to figure out how to shed the dead mass as you go. > Personally, I've a
46.
by yjftsjthsd-h 25d ago
Yep, that sounds like the same idea: > The format is very simple: it adds some accounting info at the start of the file, and then appends all the ELF binaries after it, adding padding for alignment. The end of the file isn't touched
47.
by yjftsjthsd-h 25d ago
Maybe, but ELF doesn't support doing so
48.
by yjftsjthsd-h 25d ago
> So when a third party (i.e. Valve) makes shim that grants linux functionality, it's not really on Ubisoft to maintain that. I agree that it's not on them to maintain it, but that's different from intentionally breaking
49.
by yjftsjthsd-h 25d ago
You might consider one of the alternative front ends. Won't fix the repos being unavailable, but will fix notifications about it.
50.
by yjftsjthsd-h 25d ago
So this is like https://github.com/n0-computer/dumbpipe but built out of tailscale instead of iroh?
51.
by yjftsjthsd-h 26d ago
> Mach-O does more than ELF, and enables the two-layer namespacing that makes macOS able to manage dynamic linking dependencies better than ELF. I've always admired that mach-o supports fat binaries.
52.
by yjftsjthsd-h 26d ago
If you're used to a "normal" network with a router, it's a revelation that you can go direct.
53.
by yjftsjthsd-h 26d ago
I am 95% confident you don't actually need to assign IPs. Do this: # ping all link-local devices on an interface: ping ff02::1%eth0 And then do your socat/rsync/whatever to the only IP that responds.
54.
by yjftsjthsd-h 26d ago
As the article says, > Removable storage is quite slow unless you are willing to spend a lot of money. An SSD good enough to copy tens of GB quickly is not cheap.
55.
by yjftsjthsd-h 27d ago
Losing the back half of the achieve doesn't lose your directory list. (Truth be told, I prefer the approach of sticking a copy on the front and back for redundancy, but I appreciate that that's a very specific tradeoff)
56.
by yjftsjthsd-h 27d ago
It's a trade between size and speed. If you want fast lookup, it's not a waste.
57.
by yjftsjthsd-h 27d ago
I don't think CPython targets those, though; that seems more like a micropython thing?
58.
by yjftsjthsd-h 27d ago
> RISC-V is now officially supported by CPython as a tier 3 platform! That's significant, but tier 3 is still a caveat. Still allowed to break without blocking anything or being fixed as a priority.
59.
by yjftsjthsd-h 27d ago
I always assumed you could work around this by pre-allocating a large enough header space to hold a reasonable sized directory tree. You could even then append a supplementary directory if you run out of space and just stick a pointer in th
60.
by yjftsjthsd-h 28d ago
I still have a computer that produces slightly different noise (coil whine?) depending what it's doing. Fascinating behavior.

More ›